California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB901

Introduced
2/16/17  
Introduced
2/16/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Refer
3/2/17  
Report Pass
3/15/17  
Report Pass
3/15/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Refer
3/16/17  
Report Pass
3/20/17  
Report Pass
3/20/17  
Refer
3/21/17  
Refer
3/21/17  
Report Pass
5/1/17  
Report Pass
5/1/17  
Refer
5/2/17  
Report Pass
5/10/17  
Engrossed
5/15/17  
Engrossed
5/15/17  
Refer
5/15/17  
Refer
5/15/17  
Refer
5/24/17  
Refer
5/24/17  
Report Pass
6/21/17  
Report Pass
6/21/17  
Enrolled
8/31/17  
Enrolled
8/31/17  
Chaptered
10/12/17  
Chaptered
10/12/17  
Passed
10/12/17  

Caption

County of San Diego: local elections.

Impact

The enactment of AB 901 is expected to significantly influence how local elections are conducted within San Diego County. By moving the final election for specific offices to the general ballot, the bill aims to provide voters with a clearer choice and may enhance civic engagement. This change could also help in reducing ballot fatigue by limiting the number of candidates appearing in primary elections for major offices. The bill asserts that such a specific statute is necessary due to San Diego’s unique governmental complexities and size, which cannot adequately be addressed through general legislation applicable statewide.

Summary

Assembly Bill 901, introduced by Gloria, modifies the local election process for specific offices in the County of San Diego. It allows for amendments to the county charter based on proposals from the board of supervisors or through a petition signed by 10% of qualified electors. The bill stipulates that candidates for certain county offices, such as supervisors and the district attorney, must be elected during the general election rather than the primary. Only the top two vote-getters from the primary election will appear on the general election ballot. This legislative change aims to streamline the election process and potentially increase voter turnout during general elections by ensuring that candidates are finalized through a more traditionally recognized electoral stage.

Sentiment

The general sentiment regarding AB 901 tends to be cautiously optimistic, particularly among those who advocate for electoral reforms aimed at heightening voter participation. Supporters argue that the bill enhances the democratic process by ensuring that more viable candidates are presented to the electorate. However, there may be opposition from those who are concerned that this shift could limit the number opportunities for less-established candidates to compete, potentially favoring incumbents or more sponsored candidates with greater name recognition in the primary rounds.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding the bill is whether it adequately represents the diverse array of candidates and their ability to gain visibility and traction in the electoral process. Critics may argue that moving to a general election format minimizes the role smaller, yet impactful, voices in local governance. Additionally, this legislative change raises questions about the representation of minority communities within the electoral framework, as the new structure may inadvertently marginalize candidates lacking substantial funding or pre-existing recognition.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1758

Board of Behavioral Sciences: marriage and family therapists: clinical social workers: professional clinical counselors: supervision of applicants for licensure via videoconferencing.

CA SB1024

Healing arts: Board of Behavioral Sciences: licensees and registrants.

CA SB712

Local government: California tribes: federal fee-to-trust applications to regain ancestral lands.

CA AB1675

Local government: counties: board of supervisors.

CA AB799

Counties: board of supervisors.

CA AB2189

County board of supervisors: members.

CA AB2882

County board of supervisors: members.

CA AB428

Local government: board of supervisors.