California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1162

Introduced
2/14/18  
Introduced
2/14/18  
Refer
2/22/18  
Refer
2/22/18  
Refer
3/19/18  
Refer
4/4/18  
Refer
4/4/18  
Report Pass
4/24/18  
Report Pass
4/24/18  
Refer
4/24/18  
Refer
4/24/18  
Engrossed
5/17/18  
Refer
6/14/18  
Refer
6/14/18  
Report Pass
6/27/18  
Refer
6/27/18  
Refer
6/27/18  
Report Pass
8/8/18  
Report Pass
8/8/18  
Enrolled
8/23/18  
Enrolled
8/23/18  
Chaptered
9/14/18  
Chaptered
9/14/18  

Caption

Capitol area planning: height limits.

Impact

The passage of SB 1162 is expected to impact local government planning and zoning regulations significantly. By setting a uniform height limit of 120 feet in the specified areas, this legislation aims to streamline development processes and provide clearer guidelines for builders and city planners. The bill modifies existing height restrictions that were in place, shifting the southern boundary and facilitating potentially denser development closer to the Capitol, which may enhance economic activity in the area.

Summary

Senate Bill 1162, introduced by Senator Pan, amends Section 8162.7 of the California Government Code to adjust the height limits of buildings in the Capitol area of Sacramento. The bill specifically designates Matsui Alley as the southern boundary of an area where a height limit of 120 feet will apply for blocks between L Street, 17th Street, and 16th Street. This change is intended to harmonize planning regulations around the Capitol Park and to enhance urban development while ensuring preservation of sightlines to the Capitol.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 1162 appears to be generally supportive, particularly from stakeholders focused on urban redevelopment and economic growth in Sacramento. Proponents argue that the bill will provide clarity in planning, potentially making the Capitol area more attractive for development. However, there may be dissent from community members or organizations concerned about the visual and environmental implications of increased building heights near the Capitol, although such opposition wasn't heavily documented in the discussions surrounding the bill.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balancing act between development and preservation of historical views and the environment. While the bill aims to streamline development, critics may raise concerns regarding the potential overshadowing of historical buildings or disruption of community aesthetics. The discussion emphasizes the importance of ensuring that urban development aligns with the preservation goals laid out in the Capitol View Protection Act. Overall, while the bill facilitates growth, it insists on maintaining specific protections, ensuring ongoing dialogue between development goals and community preservation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3036

Capitol View Protection Act.

CA AB1146

California Small Business Rent Relief Act.

CA AB1108

Capitol Park.

CA AB921

California Kickstart My Future Loan Forgiveness Program.

SC H4057

Railroad crossing fees

CA AB162

High-occupancy vehicle lanes: County of Riverside.

AZ HB2787

Maricopa county; division; new counties

AZ SB1292

Maricopa county; division; new counties