California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB162

Introduced
1/13/17  
Refer
2/27/17  
Refer
2/27/17  
Report Pass
2/28/17  
Report Pass
2/28/17  
Refer
3/1/17  
Refer
3/1/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Report Pass
3/28/17  
Refer
3/28/17  
Refer
3/28/17  
Report Pass
5/1/17  
Refer
5/3/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Refer
5/10/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Engrossed
5/30/17  
Refer
5/30/17  
Refer
5/30/17  
Refer
6/8/17  
Refer
6/8/17  
Report Pass
6/26/17  
Report Pass
6/26/17  
Refer
6/26/17  
Report Pass
4/9/18  
Report Pass
4/9/18  
Refer
4/9/18  
Refer
4/10/18  
Refer
4/10/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Report Pass
5/8/18  
Report Pass
5/8/18  
Refer
5/8/18  
Report Pass
5/15/18  
Report Pass
5/15/18  
Refer
5/15/18  
Report Pass
7/2/18  

Caption

High-occupancy vehicle lanes: County of Riverside.

Impact

The implementation of AB 162 is expected to enhance traffic flow by allowing more accessibility to HOV lanes for vehicles. By removing the double parallel solid lines that currently restrict lane changes, drivers will have greater freedom to enter and exit these lanes. The bill may improve the efficiency of high-occupancy vehicle travel and is aligned with state efforts to optimize traffic management, potentially mitigating congestion in heavily trafficked areas.

Summary

Assembly Bill 162 aims to amend existing traffic regulations specifically for the County of Riverside by prohibiting the use of double parallel solid lines in high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes, except for high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes. The bill mandates that any existing double parallel solid lines be removed and replaced with appropriate signage and markings aligned with state guidelines. This legislative move reflects the unique traffic circumstances in Riverside County, necessitating a special statute as opposed to a general one.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 162 is generally supportive, particularly among local transportation agencies and stakeholders who believe that the existing regulations pose unnecessary challenges for commuters. Advocates argue that this bill represents a more flexible approach to managing high-occupancy lanes and is essential for adapting to Riverside County’s specific transportation needs. However, there may be concerns regarding the implications for road safety and the effectiveness of signaling in the absence of double solid lines.

Contention

While the bill does not appear to have significant opposition, the crucial point of contention revolves around the balance between improving access to HOV lanes and maintaining road safety standards. Critics may question whether the removal of these solid lines could lead to confusion among drivers regarding lane usage. Efforts are likely needed to ensure that adequate signage and public education accompany the implementation to prevent potential hazards arising from these regulatory changes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2599

High-occupancy vehicle lanes: County of Riverside.

CA AB382

High-occupancy vehicle lanes: County of Riverside.

CA AB91

High-occupancy vehicle lanes.

CA AB1848

High-speed rail: Metrolink commuter rail system.

CA AB2757

Southeast California Economic Region.

CA AB482

California Table Grape Commission.

CA AB1759

Public trust lands: City of Sacramento.

FL H1561

Duval County