California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB91

Introduced
1/9/17  
Introduced
1/9/17  
Refer
1/19/17  
Refer
1/19/17  
Report Pass
3/21/17  
Report Pass
3/21/17  
Refer
3/23/17  
Refer
3/23/17  
Refer
4/5/17  
Refer
4/5/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Report Pass
5/26/17  
Engrossed
5/31/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Refer
6/14/17  
Report Pass
6/20/17  
Refer
6/20/17  
Report Pass
7/12/17  
Report Pass
7/12/17  
Refer
7/12/17  
Refer
7/12/17  
Refer
8/21/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Report Pass
9/1/17  
Refer
8/29/18  
Refer
8/29/18  
Enrolled
8/30/18  
Enrolled
8/30/18  
Chaptered
9/18/18  

Caption

High-occupancy vehicle lanes.

Impact

The enactment of AB 91 is intended to enhance traffic flow during rush hours by ensuring that HOV lanes are used effectively, thus potentially easing congestion. If the report prepared by the Department shows positive feasibility, it could lead to a formal change in regulations governing HOV lane usage, which would be reflected in state laws. This could represent a shift in how these lanes are utilized statewide, depending on the outcomes presented to the legislature.

Summary

Assembly Bill 91, introduced by Assemblymember Cervantes, amends the Streets and Highways Code to address the use of high-occupancy vehicle (HOV) lanes on specific highways in Riverside County, California. The bill mandates that the Department of Transportation report to the transportation policy committees on the feasibility of restricting HOV lane access exclusively to high-occupancy vehicles and other eligible vehicles during peak commuter hours. This stipulation applies to State Route 91 and State Route 60, two major thoroughfares known for heavy traffic congestion.

Sentiment

The sentiment around AB 91 appears to be largely positive from stakeholders focused on traffic management and commuter efficiency. Advocates for the bill argue that limiting access to HOV lanes during peak hours will improve overall traffic patterns and decrease travel times for high-occupancy vehicles, thereby promoting carpooling and environmentally friendly transportation methods. However, concerns were raised about fairness and the impact on drivers who may not qualify as high-occupancy or eligible vehicle users.

Contention

During discussions, some members expressed reservations regarding the potential restrictions placed on lane access, fearing it could lead to increased frustration among solo drivers. Furthermore, there are discussions on the implications for low-income individuals who may not have access to eligible vehicles—essentially Clean Air Vehicles. As the bill progresses, these points of contention underline the delicate balance between improving traffic conditions and ensuring equitable access to public roadway systems.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB382

High-occupancy vehicle lanes: County of Riverside.

CA AB2599

High-occupancy vehicle lanes: County of Riverside.

CA AB162

High-occupancy vehicle lanes: County of Riverside.

CA SCR13

Joseph Tavaglione Memorial Interchange.

CA SCR90

Joseph Tavaglione Interchange.

CA SCR7

CHP Officer Andre Maurice Moye, Jr. Memorial Freeway.

CA AB2373

Pupils with exceptional needs: adaptive sports hubs pilot program.

CA AB1385

Riverside County Transportation Commission: transaction and use tax.