California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1385

Introduced
2/17/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Report Pass
3/23/23  
Report Pass
3/23/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Report Pass
5/3/23  
Report Pass
5/3/23  
Engrossed
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/18/23  
Refer
5/18/23  
Refer
5/18/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Report Pass
6/28/23  
Report Pass
6/28/23  
Refer
6/28/23  
Refer
6/28/23  
Report Pass
7/6/23  
Enrolled
9/6/23  
Enrolled
9/6/23  
Chaptered
10/8/23  
Passed
10/8/23  

Caption

Riverside County Transportation Commission: transaction and use tax.

Impact

This amendment has significant implications for local governance in terms of fiscal authority over transportation-related funding. By allowing a higher tax rate, Riverside County can potentially enhance its investment in transport infrastructure and services, thereby aiming to improve overall mobility and safety. The ability to levy a higher tax facilitates greater flexibility in funding projects that align with the needs of the community, particularly as the population grows and its transportation demands evolve.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1385, introduced by Assemblymember Garcia, modifies Section 240306 of the Public Utilities Code to adjust the maximum transaction and use tax rate that the Riverside County Transportation Commission can impose. Previously capped at 1%, this bill raises the limit to 1.5%, subject to voter approval, which requires a two-thirds majority as mandated by the California Constitution. The bill highlights the unique transportation financing needs in Riverside County and underscores the necessity for localized funding solutions to address area-specific transportation demands.

Sentiment

The general sentiment regarding AB 1385 appears to be supportive among stakeholders focused on improving local transportation infrastructure. Proponents argue that this adjustment will provide essential funding to alleviate existing transport issues. Conversely, there may be concerns regarding the additional financial burden on taxpayers. The necessity for referendum highlights the importance of voter engagement and the potential challenges of achieving the required two-thirds approval for tax increases.

Contention

Some points of contention might arise regarding the fairness of increasing the maximum tax rate and whether it appropriately reflects the community's willingness to pay for enhanced transportation services. Moreover, discussions may involve debates over the implications of higher taxes on residents and businesses versus the anticipated benefits from improved transportation solutions. The bill's supporters will need to effectively communicate the direct benefits of this financial adjustment to gain public buy-in.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1189

Riverside County Transportation Commission: transactions and use tax.

CA AB1814

Transportation.

CA SB848

Transportation.

CA AB2599

High-occupancy vehicle lanes: County of Riverside.

CA AB382

High-occupancy vehicle lanes: County of Riverside.

CA AB162

High-occupancy vehicle lanes: County of Riverside.

CA AB91

High-occupancy vehicle lanes.

CA SB1351

Transportation improvement fee: revenue bonds.