California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1259

Introduced
2/15/18  
Introduced
2/15/18  
Refer
3/1/18  
Refer
3/1/18  
Report Pass
4/10/18  
Refer
4/11/18  
Engrossed
4/30/18  
Engrossed
4/30/18  
Refer
5/7/18  
Refer
5/7/18  
Report Pass
6/11/18  
Report Pass
6/11/18  
Refer
6/11/18  
Refer
6/11/18  
Report Pass
6/27/18  
Report Pass
6/27/18  
Enrolled
7/5/18  
Enrolled
7/5/18  
Chaptered
7/20/18  
Chaptered
7/20/18  
Passed
7/20/18  

Caption

Signage: tourist oriented directional signs.

Impact

The introduction of SB 1259 is largely a localized measure focused on improving the visibility and accessibility of businesses within Tehama County, especially those connected to the wine industry. By allowing wayfinding signage on state highways, the bill is expected to benefit local businesses by attracting more visitors to the area, fostering economic development. This localized approach reflects a recognition of the County's particular needs and supports the promotion of its agricultural identity, particularly in the context of wine tourism.

Summary

Senate Bill 1259, introduced by Senator Nielsen, amends Section 229.26 of the Streets and Highways Code concerning the placement of tourist-oriented directional signs. Specifically, the bill aims to address the unique needs of the County of Tehama by allowing exemptions from existing distance restrictions for signage related to attractions or facilities within an American Viticultural Area in the county. The current law generally mandates that signs can only be placed within ten miles of a highway intersection, but the bill seeks to alter this for facilities associated with local viticulture, potentially enhancing tourism and economic activity in the region.

Sentiment

Initial responses to the bill appeared favorable, with indications that state legislators acknowledge the benefits of supporting local economies, particularly in areas that rely heavily on tourism. The sentiment was generally positive among legislators and local business stakeholders who view the bill as a means to enhance local business traffic and bolster the region's tourism infrastructure. However, there could be concerns about how similar exemptions might lead to inconsistencies in signage regulations across other counties, presenting a potential point of contention among lawmakers.

Contention

One notable point of contention surrounding SB 1259 is the balance between state regulation and local needs. While supporters argue that the bill provides necessary flexibility to promote local businesses, critics may raise concerns about uniformity in signage regulations across the state. There is also the question of whether this special statute sets a precedent for other counties asking for similar treatments, which could lead to a patchwork approach to highway signage regulations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1617

Wine label requirements: Santa Cruz Mountains.

CA AB2694

Wine labels: Santa Cruz Mountains.

CA SB1009

Alcoholic beverages: wine labels: Mendocino County.

CA SB918

Alcoholic beverages: special nonprofit sales license: wine labels.

TX HB4058

Relating to the authority of certain holders of a wine and beer retailer's permit or mixed beverage permit to manufacture and sell wine and engage in certain related activities.

TX SB1402

Relating to the labeling of wine as originating from an area of this state.

TX HB1957

Relating to the labeling of wine as originating from an area of this state or with the name of a vineyard in this state.

TX HB4027

Relating to the authority of certain holders of winery permits to sell liquor for on-premises consumption.