California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB1415

Introduced
2/16/18  
Introduced
2/16/18  
Refer
3/8/18  
Refer
3/8/18  
Refer
4/4/18  
Refer
4/4/18  
Report Pass
4/18/18  
Report Pass
4/18/18  
Refer
4/18/18  
Refer
4/18/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Refer
4/19/18  
Refer
4/23/18  
Refer
4/23/18  
Refer
4/25/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Engrossed
5/30/18  
Engrossed
5/30/18  
Refer
6/11/18  
Report Pass
6/20/18  
Report Pass
6/20/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Refer
6/20/18  
Report Pass
6/27/18  
Report Pass
6/27/18  
Enrolled
8/29/18  
Enrolled
8/29/18  
Vetoed
9/30/18  

Caption

Housing.

Impact

If enacted, SB1415 would significantly amend state education funding laws, shifting the focus from a one-size-fits-all model to a more tailored approach that reflects the diverse needs of communities across the state. The expected result is a fairer distribution of state resources aimed at uplifting underfunded schools. The bill would require periodic assessments of funding adequacy and adjustments to ensure that equity remains a focal point in the state's educational policy.

Summary

SB1415 aims to address funding disparities among school districts in the state by introducing measures to improve financial equity in educational resources. The bill proposes a revised funding formula that factors in not only the number of students but also the socio-economic conditions within the districts, targeting increased support for those with higher needs. Proponents argue that this approach is essential to ensure that all students have access to a quality education, irrespective of their geographical or economic circumstances.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB1415 has been largely supportive among education advocates, who believe that addressing funding inequities is a critical step towards enhancing educational outcomes. However, there are concerns from some taxpayer groups about the potential for increased state spending. Critics argue that while the intention is noble, the bill could lead to complications in budget management and disputes over resource allocation among districts.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the methodology of determining 'need' among districts, with some legislators arguing for more stringent criteria, while others advocate for a broader interpretation that includes various socio-economic indicators. There is a fear among opponents that the bill could inadvertently lead to some districts receiving significantly less funding than they currently do, exacerbating existing tensions between urban and rural education needs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB468

State building standards.

CA AB1858

Substandard buildings.

CA SB1465

State building standards.

CA AB2597

Dwelling unit standards: safe indoor air temperatures.

CA AB257

Housing: building standards: violations.

NV AB211

Revises provisions relating to substandard properties. (BDR 20-811)

CA AB838

State Housing Law: enforcement response to complaints.