California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB468

Introduced
2/6/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Introduced
2/6/23  
Refer
3/23/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Report Pass
3/23/23  
Report Pass
3/23/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Refer
3/27/23  
Report Pass
4/11/23  
Report Pass
4/11/23  
Report Pass
4/11/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Refer
4/12/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Refer
4/19/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Refer
4/19/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Refer
5/3/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Engrossed
5/31/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Report Pass
6/21/23  
Refer
6/21/23  
Report Pass
7/12/23  
Refer
6/21/23  
Report Pass
7/12/23  
Refer
8/14/23  
Refer
7/12/23  
Refer
7/12/23  
Refer
8/14/23  

Caption

State building standards.

Impact

The bill introduces new inspection requirements that will impose a state-mandated local program for municipalities. Such requirements for local entities may lead to increased operational demands on local governments, which will need to allocate resources to meet these new obligations. Moreover, the legislation stipulates clearer definitions around terms like 'residential rental unit,' which might streamline processes for enforcing tenant protections and addressing violations. Overall, the bill could significantly influence housing enforcement mechanisms and strengthen tenant rights.

Summary

Assembly Bill 468, introduced by Assembly Member Quirk-Silva, seeks to amend existing sections of the Health and Safety Code related to housing, with a focus on the definition and management of substandard buildings. The bill shifts the determination of a building's substandard status from being primarily about the public's safety to emphasizing the safety and welfare of the occupants and surrounding residents. This legislative change aims to provide a clearer framework for identifying and addressing substandard conditions in residences, effectively broadening the scope of who is impacted by unsafe housing conditions.

Sentiment

Commentary around AB 468 exhibits a mixture of support and concern among lawmakers. Proponents argue that the bill strengthens necessary protections for tenants living in substandard conditions, thereby safeguarding public health and welfare. However, concerns have been raised regarding the potential administrative burdens imposed on local government agencies, which may struggle with the added responsibilities without adequate resources. Critics of the bill fear that these changes could inadvertently lead to less favorable conditions for property owners and create complexities between state-level mandates and local enforcement.

Contention

Notable points of contention within the discussions on AB 468 include the balance between tenant rights and property owners' responsibilities. Critics express fear that the bill expands governmental reach into private property management, potentially impacting the dynamics of landlord-tenant relationships. There is a concern that increased scrutiny of building conditions could lead to disputes over repair responsibilities, especially if landlords feel that tenant rights are being prioritized at the expense of their property rights. If enacted, the bill could also lead to challenges in implementing the stipulations around unlawful detainer actions and landlord declarations regarding tenancy status, which could complicate the enforcement process.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1465

State building standards.

CA AB1858

Substandard buildings.

CA SB1415

Housing.

CA AB2597

Dwelling unit standards: safe indoor air temperatures.

NV AB211

Revises provisions relating to substandard properties. (BDR 20-811)

CA AB257

Housing: building standards: violations.

CA AB957

Housing Omnibus.