California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB16

Introduced
12/5/16  
Introduced
12/5/16  
Refer
1/19/17  
Report Pass
3/29/17  
Report Pass
3/29/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Engrossed
4/17/17  
Engrossed
4/17/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Report Pass
6/13/17  

Caption

Wage garnishment restrictions: exempt earnings: student loans.

Impact

The provisions of SB16 will provide significant protections for borrowers who struggle to meet their financial obligations, particularly those indebted to private student loan lenders. By restricting garnishment to a lower percentage of disposable income, the bill aims to enhance the financial wellbeing of these individuals, allowing them to retain more of their earnings for essential expenses. This change may alleviate the financial burden faced by many residents affected by the rising costs of education and student debt. Such a measure could foster a fairer approach to debt collection in California, reflecting a growing emphasis on consumer protection.

Summary

Senate Bill No. 16, introduced by Senator Wieckowski, aims to modify the existing wage garnishment laws in California by introducing specific protections for individuals with student loans that are not backed by the federal government. The bill adds Section 706.053 to the Code of Civil Procedure, which alters how much of a debtor's disposable earnings can be garnished to satisfy judgments on non-federally backed student loans. Under the current law, up to 25% of an individual's disposable earnings can be garnished; however, SB16 proposes to reduce this limit to a maximum of 15% or 50% of the amount exceeding a certain threshold based on the state minimum wage for debts related to qualifying student loans.

Contention

While the bill has garnered support based on its consumer protection merits, it may face opposition from financial institutions and creditors who argue that restricting garnishments could hinder their ability to recover debts. Critics may express concerns over the potential implications for non-federally backed student loan programs and how lower recovery rates could affect lending practices. Debates around the bill might revolve around balancing creditor rights with debtor protection, illustrating the ongoing conflict between consumer financial security and the need for lenders to recoup their loans.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1477

Enforcement of judgments: wage garnishment.

CA SB1035

Criminal procedure: fines, fees, and restitution.

CA AB2837

Civil actions: enforcement of money judgments.

IL HB2542

CHILD SUPPORT-SHARED CARE

CA AB774

Civil actions: enforcement of judgments.

IL SB3284

IMDMA-PARENTING-CHILD SUPPORT

CO SB173

Colorado Child Support Commission Recommendations

CA AB1383

Contractors: discipline: noncompliance with child support obligations.