California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB182

Introduced
1/24/17  
Introduced
1/24/17  
Refer
2/2/17  
Refer
2/2/17  
Refer
3/23/17  
Refer
3/23/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Refer
4/17/17  
Report Pass
5/3/17  
Report Pass
5/3/17  
Refer
5/3/17  
Report Pass
5/15/17  
Report Pass
5/15/17  
Engrossed
5/22/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Report Pass
6/28/17  
Report Pass
6/28/17  
Refer
6/29/17  
Refer
6/29/17  
Report Pass
7/20/17  
Report Pass
7/20/17  
Enrolled
9/11/17  
Enrolled
9/11/17  
Chaptered
10/13/17  
Chaptered
10/13/17  
Passed
10/13/17  

Caption

Transportation network company: participating drivers: single business license.

Impact

The bill has significant implications for state laws relating to business licensing and local authority over TNC operators. By centralizing the licensing process to a single jurisdiction where the driver is domiciled, the legislation aims to eliminate confusion and unnecessary regulatory burden that can arise when multiple cities or counties impose different licensing fees and requirements. This change is seen as critical in allowing for smoother operational capabilities of TNC drivers, thereby supporting the overall transportation landscape in California.

Summary

Senate Bill 182 addresses the business licensing requirements for drivers operating under transportation network companies (TNCs) in California. It mandates that local jurisdictions can only require a driver to obtain a single business license, irrespective of the number of localities the driver operates in. This ensures that drivers can work freely across different areas without facing multiple licensing requirements, thus streamlining their ability to provide services.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 182 appears to be largely positive among supporters who argue that the bill promotes efficiency and fairness for drivers. However, there is a potential concern regarding local governance, as some stakeholders may view this legislation as a reduction of local control over business operations within their jurisdictions. The balance between state regulation and local authority remains a significant topic of discussion.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the implications of sharing personally identifiable information between local jurisdictions and the potential repercussions for local control over licensing practices. While the bill explicitly states that sharing of data among jurisdictions is permitted, concerns persist regarding privacy and the individual driver's rights. Critics may argue that such statewide decrees can infringe on local government prerogatives to regulate businesses according to their specific needs and contexts.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2494

Delivery network companies.

CA AB1069

Local government: taxicab transportation services.

CA AB939

Local government: taxicab transportation services.

CA AB139

Emergency and Transitional Housing Act of 2019.

CA AB891

Public property: safe parking program.