California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB184

Introduced
1/25/17  
Introduced
1/25/17  
Refer
2/2/17  
Refer
2/2/17  
Refer
3/15/17  
Refer
3/15/17  
Report Pass
3/22/17  
Report Pass
3/22/17  
Refer
3/22/17  
Report Pass
3/29/17  
Report Pass
3/29/17  
Engrossed
4/6/17  
Engrossed
4/6/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Refer
5/18/17  
Report Pass
6/20/17  
Refer
6/20/17  
Refer
6/20/17  
Report Pass
7/13/17  
Report Pass
7/13/17  
Enrolled
9/5/17  
Enrolled
9/5/17  
Chaptered
10/9/17  
Chaptered
10/9/17  
Passed
10/9/17  

Caption

Social security number truncation program.

Impact

The passage of SB 184 is expected to strengthen privacy protections by safeguarding personal information found in older public documents. This adjustment acknowledges the risks associated with identity theft, particularly given that records from before 1980 may still include sensitive social security data. Through truncation, accessibility to these records will remain while reducing the potential for abuse of personal data.

Summary

Senate Bill 184, introduced by Senator Morrell, amends Section 27301 of the Government Code primarily to enhance the confidentiality of social security numbers in public records. The existing law mandated that county recorders create a truncation program but only applied to official records dated on or after January 1, 1980. This bill now also permits the county recorder to truncate social security numbers in records recorded prior to that date, thereby extending the protections against misuse of sensitive information.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding SB 184 appears positive. Lawmakers and stakeholders seem to agree on the necessity of protecting citizens' personal information from possible breaches. The support for the bill was evident during legislative discussions, where many emphasized the importance of adapting legal frameworks to contemporary concerns about privacy and data security.

Contention

While there was general agreement on the need for increased privacy protections, some comments during discussions hinted at contention over how broadly the law should apply. Concerns were raised about the balance between public access to records and the imperative of safeguarding personal data. The legislation is crafted to limit the potential impact on public access, but ongoing discussions may shape future amendments to ensure both transparency and privacy.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB626

Taxation: minimum franchise tax and annual tax exemption: Armed Forces.

CA AB1741

Cannabis: taxation: electronic funds transfer.

CA AB948

Cannabis: taxation: electronic funds transfer.

CA AB1879

Property taxation: filing.

CA AB633

Partition of real property: Uniform Partition of Heirs Property Act.

CA SB1528

California Department of Tax and Fee Administration.

CA AB2425

Property taxation: property records: transmission by mail or electronic format.

CA AB1397

Administration of income taxes: electronic remittance: penalty.