California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB221

Introduced
2/2/17  
Refer
2/16/17  
Refer
2/16/17  
Refer
1/3/18  
Refer
1/3/18  
Refer
1/3/18  
Refer
1/3/18  
Refer
1/3/18  
Refer
1/3/18  
Report Pass
1/9/18  
Report Pass
1/9/18  
Engrossed
1/29/18  
Engrossed
1/29/18  
Refer
4/26/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Refer
5/17/18  
Report Pass
6/19/18  
Report Pass
6/19/18  
Refer
6/19/18  
Refer
6/19/18  
Report Pass
8/8/18  
Report Pass
8/8/18  
Refer
8/28/18  
Refer
8/28/18  
Refer
8/28/18  
Refer
8/28/18  
Enrolled
8/30/18  
Enrolled
8/30/18  
Vetoed
9/28/18  

Caption

Agricultural District 1-A: firearm and ammunition sales at the Cow Palace.

Impact

The bill impacts existing firearm transfer laws by localizing restrictions on where firearms and ammunition can be sold, aiming to enhance public safety in a high-profile venue. By establishing a new misdemeanor crime associated with this prohibition, the Bill is seen as a progressive step towards stricter gun control measures in the state. It does provide an exception for gun buy-back events conducted by law enforcement agencies, acknowledging a method of reducing the number of firearms in circulation.

Summary

Senate Bill 221, introduced by Senator Wiener and co-authors, seeks to prohibit the sale of firearms and ammunition at the Cow Palace, a venue located within Agricultural District 1-A, which includes San Mateo County and the City and County of San Francisco. The bill outlines that, effective January 1, 2020, no officer, employee, or lessee associated with District 1-A is allowed to contract for or authorize the sale of any firearms or ammunition on the premises of the Cow Palace. Furthermore, the legislation specifies enforcement measures for violations, categorizing them as misdemeanors.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 221 appears supportive among advocates for gun control, who view it as a necessary measure to reduce gun sales in public venues and enhance community safety. Conversely, there may be opposition from gun rights advocates and stakeholders concerned about the implications of restricting gun sales, perceiving this action as an erosion of rights guaranteed under firearm legislation.

Contention

Notable contention surrounding SB 221 arises from debates about local versus state control over firearm regulations. Some argue that restricting firearm sales at venues such as the Cow Palace disproportionately affects legal firearm owners and retailers, while others believe that localized regulations serve to protect community safety effectively. The absence of a reimbursement clause for local agencies affected by this bill raises further discussions about the economic implications for local entities managing the Cow Palace.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB281

Housing development: permits and other entitlements: extension.

CA SB264

Firearms: the OC Fair and Event Center.

CA AB893

22nd District Agricultural Association: firearm and ammunition sales at the Del Mar Fairgrounds.

CA SB867

Sea level rise: planning and adaptation.

CA SB341

Telecommunications service: outages.

CA AB1509

San Francisco Bay Area Rapid Transit District.