California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB264

Introduced
2/8/17  
Introduced
2/8/17  
Refer
2/16/17  
Refer
2/16/17  
Refer
4/4/17  
Refer
4/4/17  
Refer
4/6/17  
Refer
4/6/17  
Failed
2/1/18  

Caption

High-occupancy toll lanes: Interstate 405 Improvement Project high-occupancy toll lanes.

Impact

The implementation of SB 264 is expected to enhance state transportation laws by specifically designating how revenues from tolls will be utilized. The bill emphasizes the need for addressing traffic flow and congestion in the project corridor, which includes major cities like Costa Mesa, Huntington Beach, and Westminster. By formally channeling funds towards specified improvement projects, the bill aims to mitigate road wear and improve overall transportation infrastructure in Orange County. This could lead to better road maintenance and enhanced public transport options in the future.

Summary

Senate Bill 264, introduced by Senator Nguyen, addresses the management of high-occupancy toll (HOT) lanes associated with the Interstate 405 Improvement Project in Orange County. The bill modifies existing regulations regarding the allocation of excess toll revenues generated from these lanes. Specifically, it mandates that the net excess toll revenues be divided, with 20% going to the Orange County Transportation Authority, 70% distributed among local jurisdictions along the project corridor, and 10% to jurisdictions not along the corridor. This structured allocation aims to ensure that the funds are utilized effectively for transportation improvements in the affected areas.

Sentiment

General sentiment regarding SB 264 appears to support its goals of improving transportation efficiency and infrastructure in a heavily trafficked area. Proponents argue that the clear allocation of toll revenues will lead to tangible benefits such as reduced congestion and better road conditions. However, some stakeholders stress the importance of transparency in how these funds will be spent to ensure that they benefit the communities involved.

Contention

Notably, there are discussions about how the newer allocation model might impact municipalities differently. Some critics are concerned that the distribution of funds may favor larger jurisdictions over smaller ones, potentially leading to disparities in infrastructure investment. Additionally, there are calls for ongoing monitoring and assessment of how the collected toll revenues are utilized, to ensure that they meet the transportation needs of all residents and do not disproportionately advantage certain areas.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1456

Department of Transportation: federal environmental review process: Los Angeles County Metropolitan Transportation Authority.

CA SB595

Metropolitan Transportation Commission: toll bridge revenues: BART Inspector General: Santa Clara Valley Transportation Authority: high-occupancy toll lanes.

CA AB1113

State Transit Assistance Program.

CA AB455

San Francisco-Oakland Bay Bridge: bus speed and reliability performance targets.

CA SB279

High-Speed Rail Authority: supplemental business plan.

CA SB120

Water conveyance: use of facility with unused capacity.

CA AB135

Transportation.

CA SB1260

High-speed rail: independent review: High-Speed Rail Authority Inspector General.