Firearms dealers: storage and security.
If enacted on July 1, 2018, as proposed, SB 464 would not only codify existing practices but also impose additional requirements that firearms dealers must follow. The bill requires firearms to be secured using several approved methods, such as hardened steel rods or cables, locked fireproof safes, or specialized display cases. In areas where firearms dealers' premises are at street level, installation of concrete or hardened steel bollards is mandated to protect against vehicle breaches, enhancing physical security measures significantly.
Senate Bill 464, introduced by Senator Hill, aims to enhance the security requirements for firearms dealers in California. The bill amends the existing provisions of Section 26890 of the Penal Code, mandating that all inventory firearms must be stored in secure facilities when the dealer is not open for business. This replaces a previous set of regulations and introduces new measures intended to strengthen the secure handling and storage of firearms within commercial premises, thereby aiming to reduce theft and unauthorized access to firearms.
The sentiment around SB 464 has been generally supportive among proponents who argue that the added security measures are necessary in light of ongoing concerns regarding gun violence and theft. By ensuring firearms are kept secured, the proponents believe this will contribute positively to community safety. However, some dissenting voices argue that imposing stringent security measures may place an undue burden on small firearms dealers, fearing that the compliance costs could drive them out of business without significantly impacting criminal activity.
Notable points of contention regarding SB 464 focus on the balance between enhancing public safety through rigorous security requirements and the potential negative impact on small businesses. Critics contend that while securing firearms is essential, the specific requirements may not account for the unique circumstances of every dealer, particularly in relation to local regulations or physical limitations of existing structures. Additionally, there are concerns that the bill could disproportionately affect nonprofit organizations that engage in auctioning firearms for charitable causes, as they may find compliance with these new guidelines challenging.