California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB654

Introduced
2/17/17  
Refer
3/9/17  
Refer
3/9/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Refer
4/18/17  
Report Pass
4/25/17  
Report Pass
4/25/17  
Refer
4/25/17  
Refer
4/25/17  
Engrossed
5/15/17  
Engrossed
5/15/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Refer
6/1/17  
Report Pass
6/22/17  
Refer
6/22/17  
Refer
6/22/17  
Report Pass
7/19/17  
Enrolled
8/24/17  
Enrolled
8/24/17  
Chaptered
9/11/17  
Passed
9/11/17  

Caption

Local moratorium: gambling tables.

Impact

The introduction of SB 654 aims to enhance local economic opportunities by enabling gambling establishments to remain open around the clock, thus potentially increasing revenue for local governments. Allowing such extended hours could attract more patrons and improve local business ecosystems. The bill represents an effort to modernize gambling operations in light of evolving consumer expectations and competition from other forms of entertainment, thereby promoting an adaptive regulatory framework that reflects contemporary societal trends.

Summary

Senate Bill 654, introduced by Senator Dodd, amends the Business and Professions Code to allow cities, counties, or city and county jurisdictions to extend the operating hours of gambling establishments up to 24 hours a day, seven days a week. This legislation provides local governments with greater flexibility in managing gambling operations within their respective areas, highlighting a shift toward local control over gambling regulations after years of strict limitations set by state law. Previously, expansions of gambling activities required public voter approval unless the changes were minimal.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding SB 654 is generally supportive among local government officials and business stakeholders, who view the measure as a means to stimulate economic growth and enhance local business viability. However, concerns persist regarding the implications of increased gambling availability, including potential negative impacts on community welfare and increased problem gambling. Advocates argue that local legislatures are best suited to determine the needs and regulations suitable for their communities, while opponents warn of the risks associated with expanded gambling hours.

Contention

Notable points of contention relate to the ongoing balance between regulation and local autonomy. Critics of SB 654 may argue that while local governments gain more power, there is insufficient oversight on potential adverse consequences, such as gambling addiction and crime. Additionally, questions arise about the ramifications for social services and community health. As gambling becomes more present in local economies, discussions are likely to emerge regarding the appropriateness of such expansions and the need for corresponding support systems.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB576

Gambling: local moratorium.

CT HB05197

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Program Review And Investigations Committee Concerning The Postponement Of Program Termination Dates In The Sunset Law.

CA AB3061

State highways: property leases.

NV AB308

Revises provisions relating to cannabis establishment agents. (BDR 56-822)

CT SB01027

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Program Review And Investigations Committee Concerning The Postponement Of Program Termination Dates In The Sunset Law.

CA SB1089

Food and prescription access: grocery and pharmacy closures.

IL HB4222

VIDEO GAMING-CHANGE OF OWNERS

IL HB3729

VIDEO GAMING-VARIOUS