Connecticut Senate Bill SB01027

Connecticut 2011 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/17/11
• Refer: 2/17/11
• Report Pass: 3/11/11
• Report Pass: 3/30/11
• Refer: 4/11/11
• Report Pass: 4/18/11

Caption

An Act Implementing The Recommendations Of The Program Review And Investigations Committee Concerning The Postponement Of Program Termination Dates In The Sunset Law.

Impact

The bill modifies how governmental entities are monitored, providing a framework for the Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee to conduct performance audits on programs that are slated for termination. Such audits must be completed by a specified deadline, ensuring that entities scheduled for cessation demonstrate their effectiveness and justify their continued existence. This change is intended to foster greater oversight and potentially reduce wasteful spending within state operations by ensuring that only effective programs remain operational.

Summary

SB01027 is an act aimed at implementing the recommendations from the Program Review and Investigations Committee regarding the postponement of program termination dates under the sunset law. This bill seeks to amend existing statutes that outline how various governmental entities and programs may be subjected to termination if not reestablished. The proposed act replaces certain sections of the general statutes to ensure a structured process for reviewing the performance of these programs before any termination takes place, which is aimed at improving government efficiency and accountability.

Sentiment

Discussions around SB01027 have generally highlighted a supportive sentiment among members who prioritize government accountability and efficiency. Proponents of the bill advocate for the necessary adaptations to the sunset law as a means to prevent arbitrary program termination and to reinforce the importance of regular evaluations of government entities. However, there are concerns that these audits could lead to increased bureaucracy and delays in program services, which have garnered skepticism from some lawmakers who fear that the bill may inadvertently hinder proactive government actions.

Contention

The primary contention surrounding SB01027 stems from differing opinions on how best to manage government programs and their effectiveness. Supporters argue that this structured approach prevents the hasty elimination of valuable services, while detractors warn that the added layer of bureaucracy may slow down necessary reforms and diminish the agility of government response. The debate encapsulates a broader tension between the need for efficiency in government spending and the desire to maintain flexible, responsive services to the public.