California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB835

Introduced
1/4/18  
Introduced
1/4/18  
Refer
1/16/18  
Refer
3/5/18  
Report Pass
3/19/18  
Report Pass
3/19/18  
Refer
3/20/18  
Refer
3/20/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Engrossed
5/29/18  
Engrossed
5/29/18  
Refer
6/4/18  
Refer
6/4/18  
Report Pass
6/12/18  
Report Pass
6/12/18  
Refer
6/12/18  
Report Pass
8/16/18  
Report Pass
8/16/18  
Enrolled
8/30/18  
Enrolled
8/30/18  

Caption

Parks: smoking ban.

Impact

The enactment of SB 835 will create a new crime specifically related to the behavior of smoking within California's state parks. It promotes cleaner parks and healthier environments for all visitors, particularly in recreational areas that may be frequented by children and families. By limiting tobacco-related activities, the law seeks to enhance the quality of life within these public spaces, reducing the risks associated with secondhand smoke and litter from tobacco products.

Summary

Senate Bill 835, introduced by Senator Glazer, establishes a comprehensive smoking ban in units of the state park system in California. This law aims to address public health concerns and environmental protection by prohibiting smoking and the disposal of tobacco waste in these areas. A violation of the law will result in an infraction punishable by a fine of up to $25. The bill also requires the Department of Parks and Recreation to post signage to inform visitors of the smoking prohibition, which will only be enforced once proper signs have been established.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 835 appears to be predominantly positive, reflecting a community desire for healthier parks and reduced smoking in public spaces. Supporters view the smoking ban as a necessary step towards protecting public health and enhancing environmental quality. Conversely, while concerns regarding personal freedoms related to smoking may exist, they are outweighed by the benefits projected from the bill's implementation, as highlighted in various discussions leading up to its passage.

Contention

Notable points of contention surrounding SB 835 include the implications for personal choice and the enforcement of the new law. While many view the prohibition of smoking in parks as beneficial for overall public health and safety, some advocates for personal liberties may argue that the law encroaches on individual rights. Additionally, concerns have been raised about the practical enforcement of the law and how individuals will be educated about the changes, although the bill provides provisions for signage to address this concern.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB836

State beaches: smoking ban.

CA SB8

State parks: state beaches: smoking ban.

CA AB1718

State parks: state beaches: smoking ban.

CA SB386

State beaches and parks: smoking ban.

CA AB1097

State beaches and parks: smoking ban.