California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB8

Introduced
12/3/18  
Introduced
12/3/18  
Refer
1/16/19  
Refer
1/16/19  
Report Pass
3/12/19  
Report Pass
3/12/19  
Refer
3/12/19  
Refer
3/12/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Refer
6/3/19  
Refer
6/3/19  
Report Pass
6/18/19  
Refer
6/18/19  
Refer
6/18/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Enrolled
9/11/19  
Chaptered
10/11/19  
Chaptered
10/11/19  

Caption

State parks: state beaches: smoking ban.

Impact

The enactment of SB 8 marks a significant change in the management of smoking within designated public spaces. Specifically, it formalizes smoking bans that seek to safeguard public health, addressing concerns related to secondhand smoke and litter from cigarette butts, which can be harmful to both the environment and wildlife. The bill establishes a state-mandated local program, creating a new category of infractions that could potentially result in additional costs for local agencies if they need to enforce these rules.

Summary

Senate Bill 8, known as the State Parks and Beaches Smoking Ban, aims to improve public health and environmental quality by prohibiting smoking on state beaches and in units of the state park system. Under this legislation, individuals caught smoking will incur an infraction punishable by a fine of up to $25. The bill also forbids the disposal of cigarette or cigar waste on these premises unless placed in designated waste receptacles. The Department of Parks and Recreation is tasked with developing and posting appropriate signage to notify the public about these prohibitions.

Sentiment

Opinions on SB 8 are mixed; supporters emphasize the public health benefits and the need for a cleaner environment, particularly at popular recreational areas. Conversely, some opponents may argue the bill represents an overreach by the state into personal freedoms and personal choice regarding smoking. However, overall sentiment appears to lean towards support for initiatives that promote health and environmental sustainability.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding SB 8 lies in the balance between public health initiatives and personal liberties. While many lawmakers and advocates support the rationale behind the smoking ban, some critics voice concerns about restrictions on individual choice and the potential implications for enforcement. Furthermore, the lack of reimbursement requirements for local agencies related to the new infraction may also lead to debates about financial responsibilities and operational impacts on local governance.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB836

State beaches: smoking ban.

CA SB835

Parks: smoking ban.

CA AB1718

State parks: state beaches: smoking ban.

CA SB631

Nitrous oxide: retail sales.

CA SB193

Nitrous oxide: retail sales.

CA SB386

State beaches and parks: smoking ban.