California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB966

Introduced
1/31/18  
Refer
2/8/18  
Refer
3/21/18  
Report Pass
4/9/18  
Refer
4/10/18  
Refer
4/10/18  
Report Pass
5/25/18  
Engrossed
5/31/18  
Engrossed
5/31/18  
Refer
6/11/18  
Refer
6/19/18  
Report Pass
6/27/18  
Refer
6/27/18  
Refer
6/27/18  
Report Pass
8/16/18  
Enrolled
8/30/18  
Enrolled
8/30/18  
Chaptered
9/28/18  

Caption

Onsite treated nonpotable water systems.

Impact

The enactment of SB 966 is expected to significantly impact state water policies by requiring uniformity in standards across various jurisdictions, reducing potential disparities in local regulations regarding nonpotable water systems. Local governments that choose to implement these systems must adopt local programs that align with the state standards, ensuring comprehensive monitoring and reporting of water quality data. This regulatory approach seeks to enhance public safety while maximizing water conservation efforts in urban settings.

Summary

Senate Bill 966, introduced by Senator Wiener, establishes a regulatory framework for onsite treated nonpotable water systems in California. It mandates the State Water Resources Control Board to adopt risk-based water quality standards by December 2022 for the treatment and reuse of nonpotable water in multifamily residential, commercial, and mixed-use settings. These standards aim to protect public health while promoting sustainable water use. The bill emphasizes collaboration among state agencies and local jurisdictions to create customized programs adhering to the established regulations.

Sentiment

The bill has garnered varying sentiments among stakeholders. Proponents emphasize the importance of regulatory consistency in water quality, viewing it as a step towards better environmental stewardship and efficient water management. Conversely, some critics express concern regarding the feasibility of compliance for local communities that may struggle with the financial and logistical demands of implementing such stringent standards. As a result, the discussions surrounding this bill encapsulate a broader debate on state versus local control, especially in the context of resource management.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the balance between regulatory oversight and local autonomy. While SB 966 does empower local jurisdictions to craft their solutions for managing nonpotable water, critics argue that the imposed state standards could constrict local governments from tailoring programs according to specific community needs. Additionally, the bill does not address untreated graywater and rainwater systems, which may raise additional concerns among stakeholders focused on holistic water management practices.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB1121

Recycled water: onsite treated nonpotable water systems: local jurisdiction permitting.

CA AB2811

California Building Standards Commission: recycled water: nonpotable water systems.

CA AB836

California Building Standards Commission: recycled water: nonpotable water systems.

CA SB745

The Drought-Resistant Buildings Act.

CA SB1198

Wade Kilpatrick Gas Safety and Workforce Adequacy Act of 2020.

CA SB740

Onsite treated water.

CA SB92

Public resources.

CA AB108

Education: Child care: individualized county child care subsidy plans: the Every Kid Counts (EKC) Act.