California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SCA6

Introduced
2/13/17  
Introduced
2/13/17  
Refer
2/23/17  
Refer
3/29/17  
Refer
4/5/17  
Refer
4/5/17  
Refer
5/1/17  
Refer
5/1/17  
Refer
5/11/17  
Refer
5/17/17  

Caption

Local transportation measures: special taxes: voter approval.

Impact

If enacted, SCA 6 would potentially incentivize local governments to pursue transportation funding initiatives by making it easier to obtain voter approval for necessary tax measures. Local jurisdictions would be empowered to propose special taxes for transportation purposes, thus increasing the financial resources available for local transportation projects. Additionally, the measure stipulates that an ordinance proposing such taxes must include a detailed expenditure plan and ensure an annual independent audit to maintain transparency and accountability in the use of funds.

Summary

SCA 6, introduced by Senator Wiener, seeks to amend the California Constitution to alter the voting requirements for local transportation taxes. Currently, local governments must obtain a two-thirds majority from voters to impose special taxes. This amendment proposes to reduce that requirement to a 55% majority specifically for transportation-related measures, allowing local governments more flexibility in funding transportation projects. This change is aimed at addressing the significant funding needs for transportation improvements and infrastructure maintenance across communities in California.

Sentiment

The sentiment around SCA 6 appears mixed, with supporters arguing that the bill is a necessary step to improve California's crumbling transportation infrastructure and that it reflects a modern approach to funding. However, concerns are raised by opponents who fear that reducing the voting threshold for special taxes undermines the original intention of the higher requirement, which was to ensure significant public support before increasing local tax burdens. This disagreement highlights the ongoing debate over how best to balance local autonomy in transportation funding against the need for broader fiscal responsibility.

Contention

A notable point of contention surrounding SCA 6 involves the potential implications for local governance and taxpayers. While proponents assert that the bill will lead to much-needed enhancements in public transportation, opponents worry it may lead to a proliferation of new taxes without adequate public engagement. The debates surrounding the bill reflect broader concerns about taxpayer rights and the responsibilities of local governments, making the push for a shift in voting requirements a contentious issue in California's policy landscape.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB805

County of San Diego: transportation agencies.

CA AB467

Local transportation authorities: transactions and use taxes.

CA ACA1

Local government financing: affordable housing and public infrastructure: voter approval.

CA AB1487

San Francisco Bay area: housing development: financing.

CA AB1825

Education finance: constitutional minimum funding obligation: local control funding formula.

CA SB859

Education finance: constitutional minimum funding obligation: local control funding formula.

CA AB1866

Transportation funding.