By declaring April as Autism Awareness Month, SCR22 aims to promote greater understanding and advocacy for individuals with autism and their families. This gesture not only highlights the disorder but aims to foster a supportive environment across California for those affected. Furthermore, it can encourage local communities and organizations to engage in educational activities and events that raise awareness, ultimately aiming for better funding and resources for autism services and treatments.
Senate Concurrent Resolution No. 22, authored by Hueso, aims to designate April 2017 as Autism Awareness Month in California. The resolution seeks to encourage residents to support awareness initiatives concerning autism spectrum disorders. The resolution comes in response to the increasing prevalence of autism diagnoses, with statistics showing that approximately 1 in 68 children are diagnosed on the spectrum nationwide. The bill emphasizes the importance of early intervention and support services for individuals with autism, as well as the significant community and family involvement required to manage the emotional and financial challenges associated with the disorder.
The sentiment around the resolution is broadly positive, reflecting a unified front among legislators in recognizing the challenges faced by individuals with autism and their families. The measure has garnered support from various stakeholders who see the necessity of spreading awareness and promoting understanding of autism. The sentiment appears to be supportive of collaborative efforts for advocacy, although there may be underlying concerns related to resource allocation and the practical implementation of awareness programs.
While SCR22 does not evoke significant controversy, it does bring to light the ongoing conversation surrounding the adequacy of support for autism services within the state. Some may argue that simply designating a month for awareness is not enough and that more comprehensive legislative action is required to address funding and resources for autism treatment and services. Thus, while the bill itself is relatively benign, it opens the door for discussions on the broader legislative landscape surrounding autism support in California.