California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SR74 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-Enrolled February 13, 2018 Passed IN Senate February 12, 2018 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION Senate Resolution No. 74Introduced by Senators De Len, Wiener, Allen, Atkins, Beall, Bradford, Dodd, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Jackson, Lara, Leyva, McGuire, Mitchell, Monning, Newman, Pan, Portantino, Roth, Skinner, Stern, and WieckowskiJanuary 22, 2018 Relative to net neutrality LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTSR 74, De Len. Digest KeyBill TextWHEREAS, Net neutrality is the principle that the Internet should always remain a free, open, and egalitarian platform, where ideas and information are equally accessible to all parties; andWHEREAS, In December 2017, the Trump Administrations Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted to repeal its 2015 Open Internet Order, which established strong net neutrality protections for American consumers and businesses who rely on the Internet; andWHEREAS, Three short decades ago, the world was just discovering the Internet and we had no idea just how rapidly and completely it would change our lives, from the way we communicate, to how we do business, how we get around, and even how we buy our groceries; andWHEREAS, Millions of Americans of every income level and political persuasion depend on a free and open Internet for their livelihoods; andWHEREAS, Today, the Internet is critical to free expression, free speech, and democracy; andWHEREAS, The FCCs recent repeal of net neutrality protections directly contradicts the will of the vast majority of Americans; andWHEREAS, Repealing net neutrality protections gives Internet service providers the power to sabotage their competition by throttling Internet speeds for competing content and the power to charge for priority bandwidth, which can give companies an unfair advantage in the race for our time, attention, and business; andWHEREAS, Without strong net neutrality protections, there is nothing to stop the companies that already monopolize the Internet from blocking certain Internet Web sites or information altogether; andWHEREAS, Californias nearly 40 million residents and our global economythe sixth largest on the planet by gross domestic productare heavily dependent on fair and competitive protections for Internet access; andWHEREAS, California has joined several states, including Washington, New York, Nebraska, Rhode Island, and New Jersey, in proposing state laws to protect consumers by establishing our own net neutrality protections; now, therefore, be itResolved by the Senate of the State of California, That the public interest in a free and open Internet outweighs the profits and political motives of Internet service providers; and be it furtherResolved, That the Senate urges the FCC to reinstate the 2015 Open Internet Order; and be it furtherResolved, That the Senate urges the United States Congress to intervene to protect net neutrality and codify its principles in statute; and be it furtherResolved, That the Senate commends the efforts of United States Senator Markey, Congressman Doyle, and their colleagues to use the Congressional Review Act to issue a resolution of disapproval to reverse the FCCs misguided decision to repeal the 2015 Open Internet Order; and be it furtherResolved, That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.
1+CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION Senate Resolution No. 74Introduced by Senators De Len, Wiener, Allen, Atkins, Beall, Bradford, Dodd, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Jackson, Lara, Leyva, McGuire, Mitchell, Monning, Newman, Pan, Portantino, Roth, Skinner, Stern, and WieckowskiJanuary 22, 2018 Relative to net neutrality. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTSR 74, as introduced, De Len. Digest KeyBill TextWHEREAS, Net neutrality is the principle that the Internet should always remain a free, open, and egalitarian platform, where ideas and information are equally accessible to all parties; andWHEREAS, In December 2017, the Trump Administrations Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted to repeal its 2015 Open Internet Order, which established strong net neutrality protections for American consumers and businesses who rely on the Internet; andWHEREAS, Three short decades ago, the world was just discovering the Internet and we had no idea just how rapidly and completely it would change our lives, from the way we communicate, to how we do business, how we get around, and even how we buy our groceries; andWHEREAS, Millions of Americans of every income level and political persuasion depend on a free and open Internet for their livelihoods; andWHEREAS, Today, the Internet is critical to free expression, free speech, and democracy; andWHEREAS, The FCCs recent repeal of net neutrality protections directly contradicts the will of the vast majority of Americans; andWHEREAS, Repealing net neutrality protections gives Internet service providers the power to sabotage their competition by throttling Internet speeds for competing content and the power to charge for priority bandwidth, which can give companies an unfair advantage in the race for our time, attention, and business; andWHEREAS, Without strong net neutrality protections, there is nothing to stop the companies that already monopolize the Internet from blocking certain Internet Web sites or information altogether; andWHEREAS, Californias nearly 40 million residents and our global economythe sixth largest on the planet by gross domestic productare heavily dependent on fair and competitive protections for Internet access; andWHEREAS, California has joined several states, including Washington, New York, Nebraska, Rhode Island, and New Jersey, in proposing state laws to protect consumers by establishing our own net neutrality protections; now, therefore, be itResolved by the Senate of the State of California, That the public interest in a free and open Internet outweighs the profits and political motives of Internet service providers; and be it furtherResolved, That the Senate urges the FCC to reinstate the 2015 Open Internet Order; and be it furtherResolved, That the Senate urges the United States Congress to intervene to protect net neutrality and codify its principles in statute; and be it furtherResolved, That the Senate commends the efforts of United States Senator Markey, Congressman Doyle, and their colleagues to use the Congressional Review Act to issue a resolution of disapproval to reverse the FCCs misguided decision to repeal the 2015 Open Internet Order; and be it furtherResolved,That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.
22
3- Enrolled February 13, 2018 Passed IN Senate February 12, 2018 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION Senate Resolution No. 74Introduced by Senators De Len, Wiener, Allen, Atkins, Beall, Bradford, Dodd, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Jackson, Lara, Leyva, McGuire, Mitchell, Monning, Newman, Pan, Portantino, Roth, Skinner, Stern, and WieckowskiJanuary 22, 2018 Relative to net neutrality LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTSR 74, De Len. Digest Key
3+ CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION Senate Resolution No. 74Introduced by Senators De Len, Wiener, Allen, Atkins, Beall, Bradford, Dodd, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Jackson, Lara, Leyva, McGuire, Mitchell, Monning, Newman, Pan, Portantino, Roth, Skinner, Stern, and WieckowskiJanuary 22, 2018 Relative to net neutrality. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTSR 74, as introduced, De Len. Digest Key
44
5- Enrolled February 13, 2018 Passed IN Senate February 12, 2018
65
7-Enrolled February 13, 2018
8-Passed IN Senate February 12, 2018
6+
7+
98
109 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20172018 REGULAR SESSION
1110
1211 Senate Resolution No. 74
1312
1413 Introduced by Senators De Len, Wiener, Allen, Atkins, Beall, Bradford, Dodd, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Jackson, Lara, Leyva, McGuire, Mitchell, Monning, Newman, Pan, Portantino, Roth, Skinner, Stern, and WieckowskiJanuary 22, 2018
1514
1615 Introduced by Senators De Len, Wiener, Allen, Atkins, Beall, Bradford, Dodd, Hernandez, Hertzberg, Hill, Hueso, Jackson, Lara, Leyva, McGuire, Mitchell, Monning, Newman, Pan, Portantino, Roth, Skinner, Stern, and Wieckowski
1716 January 22, 2018
1817
19- Relative to net neutrality
18+ Relative to net neutrality.
2019
2120 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
2221
2322 ## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
2423
25-SR 74, De Len.
24+SR 74, as introduced, De Len.
2625
2726
2827
2928 ## Digest Key
3029
3130 ## Bill Text
3231
3332 WHEREAS, Net neutrality is the principle that the Internet should always remain a free, open, and egalitarian platform, where ideas and information are equally accessible to all parties; and
3433
3534 WHEREAS, In December 2017, the Trump Administrations Federal Communications Commission (FCC) voted to repeal its 2015 Open Internet Order, which established strong net neutrality protections for American consumers and businesses who rely on the Internet; and
3635
3736 WHEREAS, Three short decades ago, the world was just discovering the Internet and we had no idea just how rapidly and completely it would change our lives, from the way we communicate, to how we do business, how we get around, and even how we buy our groceries; and
3837
3938 WHEREAS, Millions of Americans of every income level and political persuasion depend on a free and open Internet for their livelihoods; and
4039
4140 WHEREAS, Today, the Internet is critical to free expression, free speech, and democracy; and
4241
4342 WHEREAS, The FCCs recent repeal of net neutrality protections directly contradicts the will of the vast majority of Americans; and
4443
4544 WHEREAS, Repealing net neutrality protections gives Internet service providers the power to sabotage their competition by throttling Internet speeds for competing content and the power to charge for priority bandwidth, which can give companies an unfair advantage in the race for our time, attention, and business; and
4645
4746 WHEREAS, Without strong net neutrality protections, there is nothing to stop the companies that already monopolize the Internet from blocking certain Internet Web sites or information altogether; and
4847
4948 WHEREAS, Californias nearly 40 million residents and our global economythe sixth largest on the planet by gross domestic productare heavily dependent on fair and competitive protections for Internet access; and
5049
5150 WHEREAS, California has joined several states, including Washington, New York, Nebraska, Rhode Island, and New Jersey, in proposing state laws to protect consumers by establishing our own net neutrality protections; now, therefore, be it
5251
5352 Resolved by the Senate of the State of California, That the public interest in a free and open Internet outweighs the profits and political motives of Internet service providers; and be it further
5453
5554 Resolved, That the Senate urges the FCC to reinstate the 2015 Open Internet Order; and be it further
5655
5756 Resolved, That the Senate urges the United States Congress to intervene to protect net neutrality and codify its principles in statute; and be it further
5857
5958 Resolved, That the Senate commends the efforts of United States Senator Markey, Congressman Doyle, and their colleagues to use the Congressional Review Act to issue a resolution of disapproval to reverse the FCCs misguided decision to repeal the 2015 Open Internet Order; and be it further
6059
6160 Resolved,That the Secretary of the Senate transmit copies of this resolution to the author for appropriate distribution.