Relative to net neutrality
This resolution emphasizes the detriment of repealing net neutrality protections, asserting that without these safeguards, ISPs could engage in practices such as throttling competitors' content, creating a tiered internet experience, and ultimately compromising the integrity of online expression and democracy. California's vast population and economic position, as one of the largest economies globally, underscore the urgency of ensuring equitable and competitive internet access. By aligning with other states attempting to establish similar laws, California aims to assert its commitment to consumer rights in this domain.
Senate Resolution No. 74, introduced by Senators De León and others, addresses the critical issue of net neutrality in the wake of changes implemented by the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) in December 2017. The resolution firmly advocates that the Internet must remain a free, open, and egalitarian platform, where access to ideas and information should not be restricted by Internet Service Providers (ISPs). The resolution comes in response to the FCC's repeal of the 2015 Open Internet Order, which had established strong protections for consumers and businesses reliant on a fair Internet experience.
The sentiment surrounding SR 74 is largely supportive among legislators who recognize the essential role of an open Internet for both individual liberties and collective democracy. This sentiment is echoed in the resolution's call for Congress and the FCC to take action to restore and reinforce these protections. Yet, there remains considerable opposition from industry stakeholders who argue that regulatory frameworks could inhibit operation and innovation within the telecommunications sector.
The resolution highlights significant contention between the public's interest in preserving an open Internet and the profit motives of ISPs. Critics express concern over potential overreach of federal or state authorities into what could be a free-market solution, while advocates of net neutrality view the resolution as a necessary counterbalance to ensure fair competition. This ongoing debate reflects broader tensions in regulatory philosophy and the role of government in overseeing essential services like broadband access.