California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1043

Introduced
2/21/19  
Introduced
2/21/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Refer
3/7/19  
Report Pass
3/27/19  
Report Pass
3/27/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Refer
3/27/19  
Report Pass
5/1/19  
Report Pass
5/1/19  
Engrossed
5/9/19  
Engrossed
5/9/19  
Refer
5/9/19  
Refer
5/9/19  
Refer
5/22/19  
Refer
5/22/19  
Report Pass
6/18/19  
Report Pass
6/18/19  
Enrolled
6/24/19  
Chaptered
7/1/19  
Chaptered
7/1/19  

Caption

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign funds: cybersecurity.

Impact

The introduction of AB 1043 clarifies that campaign funds may be utilized for cybersecurity without violating existing prohibitions against using these funds for personal benefits. This change is significant as it acknowledges the vulnerability of political candidates to cyberattacks, thereby legitimizing the allocation of resources for the protection of data pertaining to electoral activities. The bill requires candidates who utilize these funds for cybersecurity to report the expenditures to the Fair Political Practices Commission, ensuring transparency in how campaign resources are managed.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1043, also known as the Political Reform Act of 1974: Campaign Funds and Cybersecurity, aims to amend existing regulations surrounding the use of campaign funds by candidates and elected officers in California. Specifically, the bill allows for the expenditure of campaign funds to install and monitor cybersecurity services and hardware for electronic devices used by candidates, elected officials, and campaign workers. This provision responds to the growing need for cybersecurity measures as political campaigns increasingly rely on digital platforms and face the risk of hacking and other cyber threats that may jeopardize sensitive information related to campaigns.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 1043 has been supportive, reflecting a recognition among legislators of the importance of cybersecurity in modern political campaigns. Many lawmakers expressed the view that securing sensitive campaign information is crucial for maintaining election integrity and protecting against potential breaches that could influence public confidence in election outcomes. The debate around the bill underscored the acknowledgment of cybersecurity as a critical area within electoral politics.

Contention

Some points of contention may arise from varying interpretations of what constitutes appropriate use of campaign funds, even in the realm of cybersecurity. Critics may argue whether the use of these funds in this manner could lead to misuse or overspending, particularly if candidates do not follow the required reporting guidelines. Additionally, concerns about the adequacy of cybersecurity measures and the potential for funding to extend beyond what is strictly necessary remain matters for future discussions within the political arena.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2528

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign statements.

KY HB373

AN ACT relating to campaign finance.

CA AB220

Political Reform Act of 1974: campaign funds: childcare costs.

CA AB1170

Political Reform Act of 1974: filing requirements.

CA AB975

Political Reform Act of 1974: filing requirements and gifts.

TX HB3258

Relating to political contributions and expenditures; providing civil and criminal penalties.

TX SB1969

Relating to ethics of public servants, including the functions and duties of the Texas Ethics Commission; the regulation of political contributions, political advertising, lobbying, and conduct of public servants; and the reporting of political contributions and expenditures and personal financial information; providing civil and criminal penalties.

MS SB2585

Campaign finance; reform.