California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1164

Introduced
2/21/19  
Refer
4/4/19  
Report Pass
4/4/19  
Report Pass
4/4/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Refer
4/8/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Report Pass
4/24/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Report Pass
5/8/19  
Report Pass
5/8/19  
Engrossed
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/16/19  
Refer
5/16/19  
Refer
5/16/19  
Refer
5/29/19  
Refer
5/29/19  
Report Pass
6/3/19  
Report Pass
6/3/19  
Refer
6/3/19  
Refer
6/3/19  
Report Pass
6/11/19  
Report Pass
6/11/19  
Refer
6/11/19  
Refer
6/11/19  
Report Pass
7/1/19  
Report Pass
7/1/19  
Enrolled
8/30/19  
Chaptered
10/12/19  
Passed
10/12/19  

Caption

Surplus state real property: disposal.

Impact

AB 1164 is significant in reforming the state's approach to surplus real estate. By facilitating the sale or lease of the San Diego State Office Building, the bill has the potential to increase the availability of funds for the state and local economic initiatives. The proceeds from the sale are mandated to fulfill existing financial obligations, including paying off state bonds, thereby reinforcing fiscal responsibility. Additionally, the bill enhances the state's ability to manage its assets effectively, ensuring that surplus properties are utilized efficiently.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1164, introduced by Assemblymember Gloria, pertains to the disposal of surplus state real property, specifically the San Diego State Office Building. The bill empowers the Director of General Services to sell, exchange, or lease this surplus property, provided the actions adhere to the existing statutory guidelines regarding state property management. The legislation reinforces the protocol that surplus state property must first be offered to local agencies and nonprofit organizations for affordable housing before being sold to private entities.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1164 appears to be largely positive, focusing on operational efficiency and economic opportunity. Supporters view the bill as a pragmatic measure that enhances the state's financial landscape and makes effective use of underutilized assets. The discussions indicate a general agreement on the necessity of maintaining a structured process for property disposal, while emphasizing the importance of prioritizing local needs through the proposed disposal mechanisms.

Contention

While the bill primarily enjoys support, there are concerns regarding local governance and the impact on communities. Critics may argue that the expedited process for property disposal could undermine community engagement in decisions that significantly affect local neighborhoods, particularly when considering the prioritization of affordable housing. There is a tension between the efficiency sought by the state and the need for local entities to have a say in property transactions that could influence housing availability and urban development.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB814

State real property: surplus.

CA AB1977

State real property: surplus.

CA SB828

Surplus state real property: disposal.

CA AB1709

Armories: sales: local agencies.

CA AB3220

Armories: lease or sale.

CA AB3090

State property: Department of the California Highway Patrol.

CA AB1057

Armories: sales: San Diego Armory.

CA AB721

Huron Hawk Conservancy.