Bar pilots: pilotage rates.
The legislation will impact state laws by refining how employer inquiries about potential employees’ criminal histories are handled, particularly for those working within criminal justice agencies. Previously, specific employment disclosures were restricted, but AB 1372 broadens these provisions to allow for greater transparency regarding nonsworn members of criminal justice agencies. By doing so, it aims to enhance workforce integrity and public safety while ensuring that the pilotage rate-setting process remains responsive to the needs of the maritime industry and adjusts appropriately for economic conditions.
AB 1372, introduced by Assembly Member Grayson Bonta, aims to amend the existing regulations governing pilotage fees and disclosure of arrest information in public employment. The bill modifies the process by which rates for bar pilotage, specifically in the Bays of San Francisco, San Pablo, and Suisun, are established. It requires the Board of Pilot Commissioners to adopt a schedule of pilotage rates and establishes regulations and procedures for regular adjustments to these rates. This initiative is described as essential to the ongoing safety and regulation of maritime activities within California's vital coastal areas.
The general sentiment surrounding AB 1372 appears to be supportive among maritime stakeholders who recognize the importance of adapting pilotage rates to the realities of growing vessel traffic and changes in the maritime economy. However, there may be mixed feelings regarding the amendments to employment disclosure laws, with some advocating for stricter privacy regulations while others argue for transparency in hiring within the criminal justice sector. Overall, the bill is likely seen as a necessary, albeit contentious, step to modernize both maritime and employment practices.
Notable points of contention include the potential for increased costs associated with bar pilotage fees due to the new rate-setting processes. There may also be pushback against increasing the scope of information that can be disclosed by employers in the criminal justice field. While proponents view this as a necessary move for accountability and safety, opponents may raise concerns about the implications for individuals with past criminal records seeking employment in public sectors. These discussions highlight the balance between public safety interests and the rights of individuals in employment contexts.