California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1456

Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
3/18/19  
Report Pass
3/19/19  
Report Pass
3/19/19  
Refer
3/20/19  
Report Pass
4/9/19  
Report Pass
4/9/19  
Refer
4/9/19  
Refer
4/9/19  
Report Pass
5/15/19  
Report Pass
5/15/19  
Engrossed
5/22/19  
Engrossed
5/22/19  
Refer
5/23/19  
Refer
5/23/19  
Refer
5/29/19  
Refer
5/29/19  
Report Pass
6/25/19  
Report Pass
6/25/19  
Refer
6/25/19  
Refer
6/25/19  
Refer
7/8/19  
Refer
7/8/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Enrolled
9/9/19  
Enrolled
9/9/19  
Chaptered
10/8/19  
Passed
10/8/19  

Caption

State highways: Route 193: relinquishment.

Impact

The passage of AB1456 allows the California Transportation Commission to relinquish control of specific segments of Route 193 to local authorities, fundamentally changing how certain highways are managed in local contexts. This measure eliminates previous requirements imposed on the City of Lincoln, such as maintaining signs for directional purposes and ensuring overall continuity of traffic flow. This change is intended to streamline responsibilities for cities when managing local roads that were previously state highways.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1456, known as AB1456, focuses on the relinquishment of a portion of Route 193 to the City of Lincoln, California. This legislative measure modifies existing laws regarding state highways and addresses the control and management of roadways that are not essential for the state highway system. By allowing the California Transportation Commission to relinquish ownership under certain terms, AB1456 provides a framework for local management of certain highway portions which could lead to more tailored local roadway governance.

Sentiment

Overall sentiment regarding AB1456 seems to favor local governance and flexibility in managing highway infrastructure. Proponents of the bill argue that it empowers local agencies, providing them the autonomy to decide the best means of maintaining the roadway without excessive state oversight. However, there may be concerns around whether local agencies are adequately equipped to manage these responsibilities without the resources or guidance previously provided by the state.

Contention

Key points of contention in the discussions surrounding AB1456 could involve debates on how relinquishing highway control impacts both local transport efficacy and regional connectivity. Critics may argue that transferring ownership to local municipalities could lead to inconsistent maintenance standards and could raise challenges in addressing broader transportation needs that span beyond local jurisdiction. Nonetheless, supporters believe that local control will ultimately lead to improved road management tailored to the community's specific needs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB512

Public postsecondary education: support services for foster youth: Cooperating Agencies Foster Youth Educational Support Program.

CA AB2272

State highways: relinquishment.

CA AB2006

State Highways: relinquishment: State Highway Route 184.

CA SB757

California Environmental Quality Act: environmental leadership projects: fixed guideway.

CA SB606

State highways: State Route 203: reduction.

CA SB52

State Route 39.

CA AB2082

State highways: State Route 138: reduction.

CA SB479

State highways: relinquishment: Routes 75 and 282.