California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2082

Introduced
2/5/24  
Introduced
2/5/24  
Refer
2/20/24  
Report Pass
3/19/24  
Report Pass
3/19/24  
Refer
3/19/24  
Refer
4/10/24  
Refer
4/10/24  
Report Pass
5/16/24  
Engrossed
5/21/24  
Engrossed
5/21/24  
Refer
5/22/24  
Refer
5/22/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Refer
5/29/24  
Report Pass
6/26/24  
Report Pass
6/26/24  
Refer
6/26/24  
Refer
6/26/24  
Refer
8/5/24  
Refer
8/5/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Report Pass
8/15/24  
Enrolled
8/28/24  
Enrolled
8/28/24  
Chaptered
9/27/24  
Chaptered
9/27/24  
Passed
9/27/24  

Caption

State highways: State Route 138: reduction.

Impact

If passed, AB 2082 will formally enable the relinquishment of certain segments of State Route 138, which runs through the City of Palmdale. This change is significant because it will free up local resources and allow the city to implement its planning and management strategies to better align with local needs. By removing the state designation from portions of the highway, Palmdale would be able to address specific infrastructure challenges without state constraints, effectively turning portions of the state highway into city-managed roads.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2082, sponsored by Juan Carrillo, focuses on the management of State Route 138, specifically allowing the California Transportation Commission to relinquish portions of this highway to local authorities, namely the City of Palmdale. This legislative change is intended to give local governments more control over local highways and roads, promoting the idea of local jurisdiction in managing infrastructure. The bill aligns with current laws that provide the commission authority to relinquish segments of state highways to local agencies under certain conditions, thus facilitating the administrative process for such transfers.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2082 has largely been positive among local government officials and residents of Palmdale, who see it as an opportunity to enhance local governance and responsiveness to community needs. Supporters argue that local control over roads will foster better management and maintenance, as the city will be able to prioritize issues specific to its residents. On the other hand, there is some concern about how relinquishing state highway status might affect funding and support from the state for future improvements.

Contention

Notable points of contention include discussions about the potential risks associated with relinquishing state highway segments. Critics express concerns about the adequacy of local funding and expertise for managing what are traditionally state-maintained facilities, fearing that this could lead to deterioration in road conditions or increased liability for the city. The balance between local autonomy and the capacity to effectively manage these responsibilities is at the heart of the debate, with stakeholders advocating for thorough planning and support mechanisms to ensure successful implementation.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB250

State highways: State Route 83: reduction.

CA AB2473

State Highway Route 185: relinquishment: City of San Leandro.

CA AB333

State Highway Route 185: relinquishment: County of Alameda.

CA SB606

State highways: State Route 203: reduction.

CA AB744

State highways: State Route 83: reduction.

CA SB1459

State highways: relinquishment: State Route 183.

CA SB504

State highways: Route 1: relinquishment.

CA AB2172

State highways: Route 133: relinquishment.