California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB250

Introduced
1/18/23  
Refer
2/2/23  
Introduced
1/18/23  
Introduced
1/18/23  
Refer
2/2/23  
Refer
2/2/23  
Report Pass
3/14/23  
Report Pass
3/14/23  
Refer
3/14/23  
Refer
3/14/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/22/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Refer
5/23/23  
Engrossed
5/22/23  
Engrossed
5/22/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Refer
5/23/23  
Refer
5/23/23  
Report Pass
6/14/23  
Refer
5/31/23  
Report Pass
6/14/23  
Refer
6/26/23  
Refer
6/14/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Refer
6/26/23  
Refer
6/26/23  
Enrolled
9/12/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Chaptered
10/8/23  
Enrolled
9/12/23  
Enrolled
9/12/23  
Chaptered
10/8/23  
Passed
10/8/23  

Caption

State highways: State Route 83: reduction.

Impact

The impact of AB 250 is significant as it redefines the control of State Route 83, aligning it more closely with local governance in Ontario and Chino. By allowing these cities the authority to maintain the highway segments, it streamlines traffic management and local infrastructure development. The relinquishment will become effective once officially recorded, indicating a procedural step that ensures both cities take responsibility for ongoing highway management and improvements. Moreover, this decision may reflect a broader trend toward localizing control of road infrastructure.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 250, amending Section 383 of the Streets and Highways Code, focuses on the relinquishment of segments of State Route 83. Specifically, it permits the California Transportation Commission to relinquish jurisdiction over portions of State Route 83 to local agencies, namely the City of Ontario and for the first time, the City of Chino. This act is meant to facilitate local governance and maintenance of highway segments that no longer serve a state highway purpose. The bill was approved by the Governor on October 8, 2023, demonstrating its support within the legislative framework.

Sentiment

The general sentiment surrounding AB 250 appears to be positive, particularly among local government officials and stakeholders who advocate for enhanced local control over transportation infrastructure. Legislators expressed support for the bill, highlighting its facilitation of better local traffic flow and conditions. This support suggests a recognition of the importance of municipal management of roadways, which could lead to targeted improvements tailored to community needs.

Contention

Notably, the bill did not face significant contention or opposition during the legislative process, which is reflected in its unanimous approval of 39-0 during a vote in September 2023. The lack of opposition may indicate a consensus on the benefits of local authority over highway maintenance and traffic management, although it is crucial to monitor future discussions to see how the enactment of AB 250 is implemented in practice.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB744

State highways: State Route 83: reduction.

CA SB504

State highways: Route 1: relinquishment.

CA AB2817

State highways: Route 1: relinquishment.

CA SB921

State highways: Route 174: relinquishment.

CA AB2172

State highways: Route 133: relinquishment.

CA SB1459

State highways: relinquishment: State Route 183.

CA AB2082

State highways: State Route 138: reduction.

CA AB1764

State highways: relinquishment: Route 184.