California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2172

Introduced
2/11/20  
Introduced
2/11/20  
Refer
2/20/20  
Report Pass
5/5/20  
Report Pass
5/5/20  
Refer
5/5/20  
Report Pass
6/2/20  
Engrossed
6/8/20  
Engrossed
6/8/20  
Refer
6/9/20  
Refer
6/23/20  
Refer
6/23/20  
Report Pass
8/4/20  
Report Pass
8/4/20  
Refer
8/4/20  
Refer
8/4/20  
Refer
8/13/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  
Enrolled
8/28/20  
Enrolled
8/28/20  
Chaptered
9/24/20  
Chaptered
9/24/20  
Passed
9/24/20  

Caption

State highways: Route 133: relinquishment.

Impact

The significance of AB 2172 lies in its potential to enhance local control over state highway portions. By transferring the relinquished segment of Route 133, the City of Laguna Beach gains not only the authority to manage traffic flow and signage but also the responsibility for maintenance. This shift allows the city to enforce localized traffic regulations, directly aligning highway use and management with the community's specific needs. Additionally, the amendment to the Streets and Highways Code indicates a preference for local governance in transportation matters, which may serve as a precedent for similar future proposals.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 2172, also known as the relinquishment of Route 133, was enacted to authorize the California Transportation Commission to transfer control of a designated section of Route 133 from the state to the City of Laguna Beach. The bill stipulates that such a relinquishment can occur only if the state Department of Transportation and the city reach an agreement regarding terms and conditions. This legislation facilitates the transfer of responsibility for maintenance and traffic management of the relinquished portion, shifting local governance and infrastructure control to the city.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment around AB 2172 was positive, with broad support for increased local control among residents and stakeholders in Laguna Beach. Proponents argued that local governance would lead to better maintenance and traffic management tailored to the unique characteristics of the community. There was consensus that local authorities typically have superior knowledge and understanding of their constituents' transportation needs. Largely, this supportive sentiment was echoed throughout the discussions surrounding the bill, underlining a strategic shift towards more localized decision-making.

Contention

Some points of contention may arise regarding the effectiveness of the City of Laguna Beach in managing the newly relinquished section of Route 133 compared to the state's previous oversight. Concerns about traffic congestion and how local authorities will handle increased civic responsibilities under their jurisdiction were raised. Moreover, questions persist about the long-term maintenance funding and operational capacity of the city to handle a state highway's complexities, thus sparking discussions about the feasibility and sustainability of such relinquishments from a budgetary perspective.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB250

State highways: State Route 83: reduction.

CA SB512

Public postsecondary education: support services for foster youth: Cooperating Agencies Foster Youth Educational Support Program.

CA AB2817

State highways: Route 1: relinquishment.

CA SB504

State highways: Route 1: relinquishment.

CA SB921

State highways: Route 174: relinquishment.

CA SB757

California Environmental Quality Act: environmental leadership projects: fixed guideway.

CA AB1456

State highways: Route 193: relinquishment.

CA SB1459

State highways: relinquishment: State Route 183.