California 2021-2022 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB744

Introduced
2/16/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Refer
3/4/21  
Report Pass
3/8/21  
Refer
3/9/21  
Refer
3/9/21  
Report Pass
4/5/21  
Refer
4/6/21  
Refer
4/6/21  
Report Pass
4/13/21  
Report Pass
4/13/21  
Refer
4/13/21  
Refer
4/13/21  
Refer
4/21/21  
Refer
4/21/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Report Pass
5/20/21  
Engrossed
5/27/21  
Engrossed
5/27/21  
Refer
5/28/21  
Refer
5/28/21  
Refer
6/9/21  
Refer
6/9/21  
Report Pass
6/24/21  
Report Pass
6/24/21  
Refer
6/24/21  
Refer
6/24/21  
Refer
7/5/21  
Report Pass
8/26/21  
Report Pass
8/26/21  
Enrolled
9/3/21  
Chaptered
9/22/21  
Passed
9/22/21  

Caption

State highways: State Route 83: reduction.

Impact

The bill empowers local governments by granting them authority over specific state highway segments that have been removed from the state highway system. Upon the commission's determination that it serves the best interest of the state, Local agencies like the City of Ontario can take over responsibilities such as maintenance and traffic management. This could enhance local responsiveness to transportation issues, as decisions can be made closer to those who are impacted by them.

Summary

Assembly Bill 744 aims to amend Section 383 of the Streets and Highways Code regarding the management and jurisdiction of State Route 83 in California. It specifically allows the California Transportation Commission to relinquish portions of State Route 83 to the City of Ontario. This legislation is designed to facilitate a transfer of control and maintenance responsibilities for a section of the highway to local authorities, thereby enabling more localized management and potentially improving services for motorists and residents in the area.

Sentiment

Overall, discussions surrounding AB 744 appear to be positive, with legislators recognizing the importance of local control in managing state resources. Supporters advocate that local management could lead to better traffic flow and enhanced services for the community. However, there may be concerns raised about the clarity of responsibilities following relinquishment, suggesting that while decentralization may offer benefits, it also requires careful implementation to avoid potential mismanagement.

Contention

Notably, there may be some contention related to the conditions under which the relinquishment occurs, particularly regarding traffic signal progression and the continuity of traffic signs. Ensuring a smooth transition in which the City of Ontario can manage the roadway effectively while maintaining necessary functionality poses challenges. Furthermore, questions about the financial implications for local governments taking on these responsibilities may also surfacing during discussions.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB250

State highways: State Route 83: reduction.

CA AB2473

State Highway Route 185: relinquishment: City of San Leandro.

CA AB333

State Highway Route 185: relinquishment: County of Alameda.

CA SB606

State highways: State Route 203: reduction.

CA SB1459

State highways: relinquishment: State Route 183.

CA AB2082

State highways: State Route 138: reduction.

CA AB2817

State highways: Route 1: relinquishment.

CA SB504

State highways: Route 1: relinquishment.