California 2017-2018 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB989

Introduced
2/5/18  
Refer
2/14/18  
Refer
2/14/18  
Report Pass
4/10/18  
Report Pass
4/10/18  
Refer
4/10/18  
Refer
4/10/18  
Report Pass
4/23/18  
Engrossed
4/30/18  
Refer
5/7/18  
Refer
5/7/18  
Report Pass
6/11/18  
Report Pass
6/11/18  
Refer
6/11/18  
Refer
6/11/18  
Report Pass
8/16/18  
Report Pass
8/16/18  
Enrolled
8/28/18  
Chaptered
9/17/18  
Passed
9/17/18  

Caption

State highways: Route 84: relinquishment.

Impact

The passage of SB 989 will have a significant effect on how local and state governments manage certain transportation routes. By allowing local authorities to take over segments of state highways, the bill supports local control and responsiveness to community needs. It specifically focuses on a defined portion of Route 84, indicating a tailored approach to transport management in California. Additionally, it emphasizes the process of relinquishing road segments that have been deemed unnecessary for state oversight, enabling the freedom for cities to make localized transport improvements and decisions.

Summary

Senate Bill 989, introduced by Senator Wieckowski, aims to amend Section 384 of the Streets and Highways Code to facilitate the relinquishment of a portion of Route 84 to the City of Fremont. This bill provides the California Transportation Commission with the authority to transfer control and maintenance responsibilities of a specific segment of the state highway located within Fremont's city limits. The relocation would take effect only under conditions deemed favorable for the state and following an agreement between the Department of Transportation and the city.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding SB 989 appears to be largely supportive, particularly from local government officials in Fremont who seek greater autonomy over transportation infrastructure. Advocates view this as an opportunity for enhancing road maintenance and community planning, while skeptics may question the broader implications of state relinquishment of roadways and potential impacts on regional connectivity. Nonetheless, the lack of opposition during its voting seems to indicate a general consensus on the bill’s intent and implementation among lawmakers.

Contention

While the bill does not seem to have major points of contention, there may still be underlying concerns about the criteria that determine which highway segments can be relinquished and the potential for uneven resource allocation between urban and rural areas. Ensuring that relinquished segments receive adequate maintenance and oversight post-transfer is critical. Furthermore, the process outlined for reaching an agreement and the effectiveness of the relinquishment are points that stakeholders will likely monitor closely to ensure accountability and successful execution of this measure.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Previously Filed As

CA AB2817

State highways: Route 1: relinquishment.

CA AB2082

State highways: State Route 138: reduction.

CA AB250

State highways: State Route 83: reduction.

CA SB606

State highways: State Route 203: reduction.

CA SB710

Sale of excess state highway property: State Highway Route 710 Terminus.

CA AB2698

Route 405: Little Saigon Freeway.

CA AB2333

State highways: airspace leases: report.

CA AB98

Planning and zoning: logistics use: truck routes.

CA AB732

Crimes: relinquishment of firearms.

CA AB776

Route 210.

Similar Bills

CA AB333

State Highway Route 185: relinquishment: County of Alameda.

CA AB2473

State Highway Route 185: relinquishment: City of San Leandro.

CA SB52

State Route 39.

CA AB2272

State highways: relinquishment.

CA AB744

State highways: State Route 83: reduction.

CA AB2817

State highways: Route 1: relinquishment.

CA SB921

State highways: Route 174: relinquishment.

CA AB2172

State highways: Route 133: relinquishment.