California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1555

Introduced
2/22/19  
Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Refer
3/28/19  
Report Pass
3/28/19  
Report Pass
3/28/19  
Refer
4/1/19  
Refer
4/1/19  
Failed
2/3/20  

Caption

Police radio communications: encryption.

Impact

The bill impacts state legislation by modifying existing laws related to the California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System. By requiring police agencies to provide access to encrypted communications for media representatives, AB1555 enhances governmental transparency. This is particularly relevant as public concerns regarding police accountability continue to rise. The new provision necessitates changes in operational protocols within law enforcement agencies to comply with the increased transparency and accessibility requirements.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1555, introduced by Assembly Member Gloria, addresses the handling of encrypted police radio communications by law enforcement agencies in California. The bill mandates that any agency operating such encrypted communications must grant access to authorized representatives of media organizations upon request. This aims to balance the need for public transparency with the operational security of law enforcement communications, especially during emergencies and critical incidents involving public safety.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB1555 appears to favor increasing transparency and public access to law enforcement communications, as evidenced by support from various public advocacy groups. However, concerns have been raised regarding operational security and the potential misuse of police communication access by media. This creates a divide in opinions, where proponents argue for the necessity of public oversight while opponents highlight the risks associated with divulging sensitive information that could compromise law enforcement efforts.

Contention

Major points of contention regarding AB1555 include the tension between public access to information and the security of law enforcement operations. Critics argue that providing media access to encrypted communications could lead to breaches of operational security. Proponents, on the other hand, maintain that this measure is crucial for maintaining public trust in law enforcement, especially in a time where community scrutiny is heightened. The bill's implementation will require careful consideration of how to secure sensitive information while still upholding principles of public accountability.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB22

Firearms: law enforcement agencies: agency firearm accounting.

CA SB221

Firearms: law enforcement agencies: agency firearm accounting.

CA SB1185

Firearms: law enforcement agencies: agency firearm accounting.

CA SB1094

Sexual assault: medical evidentiary examinations.

CA AB538

Sexual assault: medical evidentiary examinations and reporting.

CA AB44

California Law Enforcement Telecommunications System: tribal police.

CA SB1206

Local government: broadband infrastructure development project permit processing: microtrenching permit processing ordinance.

CA SB1000

Law enforcement agencies: radio communications.