California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1637

Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
3/18/19  
Refer
3/18/19  
Report Pass
4/9/19  
Report Pass
4/9/19  
Engrossed
4/22/19  
Engrossed
4/22/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Report Pass
6/4/19  
Refer
6/4/19  
Refer
6/4/19  
Refer
6/24/19  
Refer
6/24/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Enrolled
9/9/19  
Enrolled
9/9/19  
Chaptered
9/20/19  
Chaptered
9/20/19  
Passed
9/20/19  

Caption

Unclaimed Property Law.

Impact

The introduction of AB1637 could significantly impact existing laws pertaining to unclaimed property by clarifying and possibly expanding the definitions of what constitutes unclaimed property. This change might also alter how businesses report unclaimed property, which could lead to increased compliance costs for some sectors. However, the bill is poised to enhance the overall recovery process for consumers, who may find it easier to reclaim their lost assets. The bill’s passing suggests a shift towards a more proactive approach by the state in ensuring citizens are aware of their rights regarding unclaimed properties.

Summary

AB1637 addresses the regulations surrounding unclaimed property in the state. The bill is designed to streamline processes related to the reporting and handling of unclaimed property, ultimately improving the efficiency of asset recovery for owners. It emphasizes the need for greater transparency and accountability in how unclaimed properties are managed, thereby ensuring that rightful owners have better access to their lost or unclaimed assets. This reform is a part of ongoing legislative efforts to enhance consumer protection and state regulatory practices in dealing with property that has remained unclaimed for an extended period.

Sentiment

General sentiment regarding AB1637 seems to be positive, particularly among consumer advocacy groups and individuals who have faced difficulties reclaiming unclaimed property in the past. Proponents argue that the amendments proposed in the bill will not only simplify existing regulations but will also encourage a more efficient recovery process. However, there are concerns from some businesses regarding the implications of increased oversight and potential costs associated with complying with the new standards. The discourse around the bill appears to foster a sense of commitment towards enhancing consumer rights, albeit with reservations from certain sectors.

Contention

Despite the overall positive sentiment, notable points of contention rest on the balance between protecting consumers and imposing new burdens on businesses tasked with complying with the updated regulations. Some stakeholders worry that while the aim of the bill is to enhance consumer access to unclaimed assets, it may also create additional layers of bureaucracy that could complicate property handling processes. Ensuring that the legislation supports the intended goals without creating unintended consequences for businesses will be a critical aspect as discussions around the bill continue.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB3364

Judiciary omnibus.

CA SB1130

Property tax postponement: residential dwelling: manufactured homes.

CA SB151

Property tax postponement.

CA AB1596

Property taxation: base year value transfers.

CA SB1037

Property taxation: base year value transfers.

CA AB1165

Agriculture: Agricultural Sustainability Council: regulatory alignment.

CA SB890

Property taxation: change of ownership and base year value transfers.

CA AB1322

Property taxation: intercounty base year value transfers.