California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1775

Introduced
2/22/19  
Introduced
2/22/19  
Refer
3/18/19  
Refer
3/18/19  
Report Pass
4/9/19  
Report Pass
4/9/19  
Refer
4/10/19  
Refer
4/10/19  
Report Pass
1/15/20  
Refer
1/15/20  
Refer
1/15/20  
Report Pass
1/23/20  
Report Pass
1/23/20  
Engrossed
1/27/20  
Engrossed
1/27/20  
Refer
1/28/20  
Refer
1/28/20  
Refer
6/17/20  
Report Pass
6/17/20  
Report Pass
6/17/20  
Refer
6/17/20  
Refer
6/17/20  
Refer
7/1/20  
Refer
7/1/20  
Report Pass
7/31/20  
Report Pass
7/31/20  
Refer
7/31/20  
Refer
7/31/20  
Report Pass
8/8/20  
Report Pass
8/8/20  
Refer
8/8/20  
Refer
8/8/20  
Refer
8/17/20  
Refer
8/17/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  
Refer
8/30/20  
Refer
8/30/20  
Refer
8/31/20  
Refer
8/31/20  
Enrolled
8/31/20  
Enrolled
8/31/20  
Chaptered
9/30/20  
Chaptered
9/30/20  
Passed
9/30/20  

Caption

False reports and harassment.

Impact

The bill has introduced significant changes to state laws regarding the abuse of the 911 emergency system. It raises penalties for knowingly misusing the 911 system for harassment from mere infractions to misdemeanors, with possible jail time, thus strengthening the legal framework against harassment based on race, religion, and other characteristics. Furthermore, the bill creates explicit exceptions to the legal privileges that protect certain communications from being actionable, particularly those involving false allegations to law enforcement, thereby holding individuals accountable for their actions that may exacerbate community-police distrust.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1775, also known as the 'False Reports and Harassment' bill, aims to address the misuse of the 911 emergency system and enhance protections against harassment and false reporting, particularly in contexts involving race, gender, and other protected categories. The legislation amends existing laws to hold individuals accountable for knowingly making false reports to law enforcement, thereby aiming to protect the rights of individuals subjected to discriminatory police actions. By clarifying the legal consequences of such actions, the bill seeks to reduce instances of harassment that stem from prejudicial motivations, especially those affecting marginalized communities.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 1775 is that of support from civil rights advocates and organizations that see the bill as a necessary step toward addressing systemic discrimination and improving community safety. Conversely, there are concerns raised by some groups regarding the potential for the bill to discourage individuals from reporting genuine emergencies due to fears of legal repercussions, which may highlight the tension between ensuring safety and preventing abuse of power.

Contention

Notable points of contention in discussions around AB 1775 include concerns about the balance between protecting victims of harassment and safeguarding the rights of those who may face unjust penalties for unavoidable emergencies. Some critics argue that the broad definitions of harassment and false reporting might lead to unintended consequences, such as individuals hesitating to call for genuine emergencies due to fears of legal retaliation. Additionally, discussions highlighted the need for ongoing community education regarding the appropriate use of the 911 system and the potential repercussions of misusing it for harassment.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1472

Personal rights: false reports to law enforcement.

CA AB933

Privileged communications: incident of sexual assault, harassment, or discrimination.

CA AB1356

Reproductive health care services.

CA AB3024

Civil rights.

CA SB1494

Public Safety Omnibus.

CA AB2099

Crimes: reproductive health services.

MI HB5704

Criminal procedure: sentencing; mandatory sentencing for certain crimes; require. See bill.

CA AB2791

Crimes: stalking, false emergency reports, and harassment.