California Assembly Bill AB1356

California 2021-2022 Regular Session

• Introduced: 2/19/21
• Refer: 3/25/21
• Report Pass: 3/25/21
• Refer: 3/26/21
• Report Pass: 4/14/21
• Refer: 4/14/21
• Report Pass: 4/19/21
• Refer: 4/20/21
• Report Pass: 4/26/21
• Refer: 4/26/21
• Refer: 5/5/21
• Report Pass: 5/20/21
• Engrossed: 6/2/21
• Refer: 6/3/21
• Refer: 6/9/21
• Report Pass: 6/10/21
• Refer: 6/10/21
• Report Pass: 7/6/21
• Refer: 7/6/21
• Report Pass: 7/8/21
• Refer: 7/8/21
• Report Pass: 7/14/21
• Refer: 7/15/21
• Refer: 8/16/21
• Report Pass: 8/26/21
• Enrolled: 9/8/21
• Chaptered: 9/22/21
• Passed: 9/22/21

Caption

Reproductive health care services.

Impact

By making it a crime to publicly disclose personal information or images of reproductive health service providers and patients without consent, AB 1356 strengthens existing laws against online harassment. The bill increases penalties for violating these laws, including potential jail time and higher fines for actions that lead to bodily harm. This approach seeks to deter anti-abortion extremists from targeting individuals involved in such services and to promote a safer environment for accessing reproductive health care.

Summary

Assembly Bill No. 1356 addresses the increasing threats and violence against reproductive health care providers, patients, and volunteers. It amends existing laws related to the disclosure of personal information and the imposition of penalties for certain acts of intimidation or violence directed at individuals connected to reproductive health services. By expanding the definition of prohibited actions and enhancing penalties, the bill aims to provide greater protections to those seeking or providing reproductive health care, particularly abortion services, in California.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 1356 is largely supportive among proponents of reproductive rights, as it is seen as a necessary measure to protect individuals from acts of violence and intimidation. Supporters argue that the expanded protections will ensure that individuals can seek necessary health care services without fear of harassment. However, there is opposition from some groups who claim that the law may infringe upon free speech rights or could be misused against lawful protests or public debates regarding reproductive rights.

Contention

Notable points of contention include debates over the balance between free speech and the right to privacy. While proponents argue that the bill is essential for safeguarding the personal safety of providers and patients of reproductive health services, opponents express concerns about potential overreach and the unintended consequences of limiting lawful expression and assembly. The bill's emphasis on data collection and reporting related to anti-reproductive-rights crimes also raises questions about the effectiveness of such measures and their impact on community policing.