California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB182

Introduced
1/10/19  
Refer
1/24/19  
Report Pass
4/1/19  
Report Pass
4/1/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Refer
4/3/19  
Refer
4/10/19  
Refer
4/10/19  

Caption

Teacher credentialing: computer science: workgroup.

Impact

The implementation of AB 182 is contingent upon appropriations in the annual Budget Act. It is set to significantly influence teacher preparation programs by potentially increasing the number of educators qualified to teach computer science in California schools. The workgroup is tasked with assessing several factors, including overall demand for computer science education and current credentialing programs' compliance with the state's adopted standards. This is pivotal, as it reflects the recognition of computer science as a necessary academic discipline that aligns with modern technological advancements in society.

Summary

Assembly Bill 182, introduced by Assembly Member Luz Rivas, seeks to enhance teacher credentialing in California by adding computer science as a subject area for single subject teaching credentials. The bill aims to allow educators with credentials in business, industrial, technology education, or mathematics to teach computer science. This amendment is in response to the growing importance of computer science education in the curriculum and the necessity for trained educators to meet this demand. Alongside these changes, the bill mandates the establishment of a workgroup to evaluate the need for a dedicated single subject credential specifically for computer science education, providing recommendations based on statewide demand and educational standards.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 182 is largely positive, indicating a proactive approach towards enhancing the education system in response to student and workforce needs. Educators and policymakers appear to support the initiative, acknowledging the importance of computer science literacy. However, there may be underlying concerns about effectively implementing the required changes within existing educational structures and ensuring adequate funding to facilitate the development of the proposed credential.

Contention

Notable points of contention include the adequacy of funding and resources required to realize the goals of AB 182, as the success of establishing a new credential hinges on whether the state allocates sufficient budgetary support. Critics might also question the readiness of current teacher preparation programs to adapt to the new standards for computer science education, which could affect the timeline and effectiveness of the proposed credentialing changes. The bill's repeal clause set for January 1, 2025, also emphasizes that the provisions are not permanent without further legislative action.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1251

Teacher credentialing: computer science instruction: workgroup.

CA AB811

Teacher credentialing: computer science instruction: workgroup.

CA AB952

Teachers: Bilingual Teacher Professional Development Program: bilingual teacher shortage pathways.

CA SB1263

Teacher credentialing: teaching performance assessment: workgroup.

CA AB1399

Teacher credentialing: recognition of study in genocide, atrocities, and human rights.

CA AB2386

Services credentialing: services credential with a specialization in occupational therapy or physical therapy services.

CA SB614

Teacher credentialing: reading instruction.

CA AB22

Preschool data: data collection.