California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB1939

Introduced
1/16/20  
Introduced
1/16/20  
Refer
1/23/20  
Refer
1/23/20  
Report Pass
3/12/20  
Report Pass
3/12/20  
Refer
3/16/20  

Caption

Pedicabs: electric bicycles.

Impact

The impact of AB 1939 on state laws primarily centers on regulatory frameworks governing the operation of bicycles and pedicabs. By integrating electric bicycles into these definitions, the bill acknowledges technological advancements in transportation. It also subjects operators of such electric devices to the same rights and responsibilities as traditional bicycle riders. Although the bill may encourage the use of eco-friendly transport options, it also imposes state-mandated requirements for local agencies to manage the new classifications appropriately.

Summary

Assembly Bill 1939, introduced by Assembly Member Gonzalez, seeks to amend California's Vehicle Code by expanding the definitions of 'bicycle' and 'pedicab' to include electric bicycles. Under the current law, a bicycle is defined as a device propelled exclusively by human power, while a pedicab is a bicycle capable of transporting passengers for hire. The bill aims to modernize these definitions to encompass electric variations, acknowledging the rising usage of electric bicycles in transportation services.

Sentiment

Public and legislative sentiment around AB 1939 is generally supportive, especially among proponents who advocate for the promotion of sustainable and innovative transportation methods. The bill's recognition of electric bicycles aligns with broader trends toward green transportation. However, concerns may arise regarding the implementation and enforcement of regulations at the local level, as well as the potential financial implications for municipal agencies.

Contention

A notable point of contention revolves around the financial implications for local governments. While the bill specifies that no reimbursement is required for costs incurred due to the new definitions, critics argue that local agencies may still face unexpected fiscal burdens related to enforcement and compliance under the modified Vehicle Code. The bill necessitates that stakeholders remain vigilant about operational costs and compliance mechanisms to respond effectively to these changes.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2438

Transportation funding: guidelines and plans.

CA AB2986

Transportation network companies: disclosure of participating driver information.

CA SB1080

Transportation network companies: driver requirements and identification.

CA AB2716

Transportation network companies: participating drivers: safety courses.

CA AB837

Ketamine.

CA SB429

Transportation network companies: participating drivers: vehicle inspections.

CA SB757

Railroads: contract crew transportation vehicles.

CA SB1372

Airports: third-party vendors: security lanes.