California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB229

Introduced
1/17/19  
Introduced
1/17/19  
Refer
2/7/19  
Refer
2/7/19  
Report Pass
2/26/19  
Report Pass
2/26/19  
Refer
2/26/19  
Refer
2/26/19  
Report Pass
4/8/19  
Refer
4/9/19  
Refer
4/9/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Refer
4/24/19  
Failed
2/3/20  

Caption

In-home supportive services: written content translation.

Impact

If enacted, AB 229 would modify Section 12300.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code, reinforcing the obligation of the Department to provide translated written materials and video transcriptions aimed at ensuring compliance with IHSS protocols. By doing so, the bill looks to facilitate better understanding of programs among care providers, which is critical for efficient service delivery and compliance with regulatory requirements. This legislative change is expected to improve program outcomes by ensuring that vital information is accessible to all participants, irrespective of their primary languages.

Summary

Assembly Bill 229, introduced by Assembly Member Nazarian, aims to enhance communication within the In-Home Supportive Services (IHSS) program by requiring the State Department of Social Services to translate essential written content and provide captioning for videos into languages spoken by a substantial number of providers. This initiative recognizes the linguistic diversity of California's care workforce and aims to ensure that both providers and recipients can access vital program information in their preferred languages, thus safeguarding the rights of non-English-speaking individuals utilizing these services.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 229 appears to be generally positive, with broad support from both legislators and advocacy groups that represent the interests of non-English-speaking communities. Supporters argue that the ability to access information in one’s native language is paramount for effective care and can lead to better health outcomes for recipients of in-home support. The bill's proponents view it as a significant step toward enhancing inclusivity and ensuring that service providers are fully equipped to deliver care effectively.

Contention

Nonetheless, potential contention may arise regarding the costs and logistics associated with implementing the translation requirements. Opponents may voice concerns about the allocation of state resources to facilitate these translations, particularly in a financial climate where budget constraints are prevalent. There may also be debates surrounding the accuracy and quality of the translations provided, which are critical for ensuring that both providers and recipients can understand the materials adequately and that there is no miscommunication in delivering care.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1909

In-home supportive services: written content translation.

CA AB3343

In-home supportive services: provider orientation.

CA AB1823

In-home supportive services: provider orientation.

CA SB857

In-home supportive services: provider orientation.

CA AB344

In-home supportive services: provider orientation.

CA AB2310

Parole hearings: language access.

CA AB1242

Language access.

CA AB2531

Access to judicial and nonjudicial proceedings: individuals who are deaf or hard of hearing: operators of computer-aided transcription systems.