California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2541

Introduced
2/19/20  
Refer
3/12/20  
Report Pass
5/4/20  
Report Pass
5/4/20  
Refer
5/5/20  
Report Pass
5/7/20  
Report Pass
5/7/20  
Refer
5/7/20  
Refer
5/7/20  
Report Pass
6/2/20  
Report Pass
6/2/20  
Engrossed
6/8/20  
Engrossed
6/8/20  
Refer
6/9/20  
Refer
6/9/20  

Caption

Teacher preparation programs: regionally accredited institutions.

Impact

The proposed changes in AB 2541 have the potential to significantly influence the landscape of teacher credentialing, particularly for those who have completed their education at institutions outside of California. By defining regionally accredited programs more explicitly, the bill aims to streamline the certification process for educators, particularly those who have taught in accredited private schools or foreign countries. Ultimately, this could help address teacher shortages in certain subject areas by facilitating a quicker pathway to credentialing for qualified candidates.

Summary

AB 2541, titled 'Teacher Preparation Programs: Regionally Accredited Institutions', aims to amend various sections of the Education Code to refine definitions and regulations surrounding teacher credentialing in California. The bill seeks to establish clear parameters for what constitutes a regionally accredited institution, thereby impacting how teacher preparation programs are assessed and recognized by the Commission on Teacher Credentialing. This legislative move is designed to ensure that educational standards remain consistent and that graduates from these institutions meet the necessary qualifications to obtain teaching credentials.

Sentiment

The overall sentiment regarding AB 2541 appears to be cautiously supportive. Proponents argue that the bill will modernize and clarify the criteria for teacher accreditation, ensuring that the educational system can effectively adapt to changing demographics and teaching needs. However, there are concerns regarding the implications for non-traditional educational paths and the potential impact on current teachers who may not have attended regionally accredited institutions. The sentiment reflects a balance between enhancing educational standards and maintaining inclusivity in teacher preparation.

Contention

While AB 2541 is designed to improve teacher credentialing, it does raise some points of contention among stakeholders. Critics worry that the defined parameters for regionally accredited institutions may inadvertently exclude capable educators from non-traditional backgrounds. Additionally, there is debate about the adequacy of the new regulations in capturing the diverse experiences of teachers who have trained internationally or in non-accredited settings. This discussion emphasizes the importance of equitable access to teaching credentials for all qualified individuals regardless of their educational journey.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB320

Teacher preparation programs: regionally accredited institutions.

CA AB525

Teacher credentialing.

CA AB2485

Teacher credentialing: subject matter competence.

CA SB1263

Teacher credentialing: teaching performance assessment: workgroup.

CA SB488

Teacher credentialing: reading instruction.

CA AB811

Teacher credentialing: computer science instruction: workgroup.

CA SB614

Teacher credentialing: reading instruction.

CA AB672

Civil Rights Department: community assistance.