California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2690

Introduced
2/20/20  
Refer
3/12/20  
Report Pass
5/4/20  
Refer
5/5/20  
Refer
5/5/20  
Report Pass
5/21/20  
Report Pass
5/21/20  
Engrossed
6/10/20  
Engrossed
6/10/20  
Refer
6/11/20  
Refer
6/11/20  
Refer
7/1/20  

Caption

Mobilehome parks: local ordinances.

Impact

AB 2690 is expected to significantly impact local laws governing mobilehome parks across California. By requiring local governments to adopt rent stabilization ordinances, the bill seeks to address affordability issues in mobilehome housing, which is a crucial aspect of the housing market for many low-income residents. The mandated local programs necessitate the cities and counties to comply with state regulations, hence reshaping the local governance landscape in terms of tenant protections.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2690, introduced by Assembly Member Low, addresses rent stabilization within mobilehome parks in California. The bill amends existing laws by repealing the exemption for new construction and mandating that all cities and counties adopt a rent stabilization ordinance by January 1, 2023, or provide a written justification for not doing so. This shift aims to regulate rents more effectively for mobilehome tenants and establish uniformity across local jurisdictions regarding maximum rent increases.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2690 is mixed. Proponents view the bill as a necessary measure to protect vulnerable tenants from exorbitant rent increases and to promote housing stability within mobilehome communities. Conversely, some opponents argue that the bill imposes unnecessary state control over local housing policies, potentially infringing upon the ability of local governments to make decisions tailored to their specific community needs. This dual perspective highlights the ongoing debate regarding state versus local authority in housing regulation.

Contention

A point of contention regarding AB 2690 revolves around the balance of power between state mandates and local autonomy. Critics of the bill contend that the requirement for cities and counties to adopt specific ordinances fosters a one-size-fits-all approach that may not address localized housing issues effectively. Additionally, the financial implications of mandated compliance may worry local officials, as the California Constitution mandates state reimbursement for certain costs incurred in fulfilling these obligations.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB604

Mobilehome parks: water utility charges.

CA AB2588

Manufactured housing.

CA AB338

Manufactured housing: smoke alarms: emergency preparedness.

CA AB1269

Mobilehome Residents and Senior Protection Act.

CA AB925

Mobilehome parks: emergency preparedness.

CA AB1943

Manufactured housing: foundation systems: installation: common interest developments.

CA SB915

Mobilehome parks: emergency relief: coronavirus (COVID-19).

CA SB722

Mobilehomes: principal residences: rent control.