California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2736

Introduced
2/20/20  
Introduced
2/20/20  
Refer
4/24/20  
Refer
4/24/20  
Report Pass
5/4/20  
Report Pass
5/4/20  
Refer
5/5/20  
Report Pass
5/5/20  
Report Pass
5/5/20  
Refer
5/6/20  
Refer
5/6/20  
Report Pass
5/14/20  
Report Pass
5/14/20  
Refer
5/19/20  
Refer
5/19/20  

Caption

Groundwater: pumped hydroelectric energy storage systems: Joshua Tree National Park.

Impact

If enacted, AB 2736 would significantly affect California's laws regarding groundwater management, particularly aligning them with the state's Sustainable Groundwater Management Act. It would impose specific limitations on the extraction of groundwater and penalties for violations, enhancing the state's capacity to monitor and manage its water resources effectively. This includes creating the Joshua Tree National Park Environmental Protection Fund, into which civil penalties would be deposited, thereby promoting environmental mitigation efforts in the area impacted by groundwater extraction.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2736, introduced by Assembly Member Eduardo Garcia, seeks to regulate groundwater extraction for pumped hydroelectric energy storage systems located within 20 miles of Joshua Tree National Park. The bill mandates that individuals or entities extracting groundwater for these purposes submit detailed reports on their plans and monitoring data to the state water board. This regulatory requirement aims to enhance the oversight of groundwater use, particularly given the ecological significance of the area surrounding the national park. Additionally, the bill aims to establish a clear framework for compliance with federal regulations governing hydroelectric generation.

Sentiment

Sentiment surrounding AB 2736 appears to be mixed, with advocates promoting it as a necessary step for environmental stewardship and sustainable development of clean energy resources. There is recognition of the need for balancing energy development with ecological considerations, but concerns remain about the potential for overregulation that could hinder economic opportunities in Eastern Riverside County, which suffers from high unemployment and poverty rates. Thus, the discussion emphasizes both economic recovery and ecological preservation amidst ongoing climate challenges.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the balance between encouraging clean energy infrastructure and protecting the natural environment. Proponents argue that pumped hydroelectric systems could offer significant economic benefits and renewable energy resources, while opponents may raise concerns about the potential environmental impacts of groundwater extraction and the adequacy of regulatory frameworks to prevent harm to local ecosystems. This debate highlights the complexities of energy policy in relation to environmental health and local community needs.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB754

Water management planning: water shortages.

CA AB2962

Wholesale Regional Water System Security and Reliability Act.

TX HB720

Relating to appropriations of water for recharge of aquifers and use in aquifer storage and recovery projects.

CA AB313

Water.

CA AB1921

Energy: renewable electrical generation facilities: definition.

CA SB1420

Hydrogen production facilities: certification and environmental review.

CA AB1176

Energy: renewable energy resources program.

CA AB2079

Groundwater extraction: large-diameter, high-capacity water wells: permits.