Public utilities: cooperation with immigration authorities.
The bill modifies Sections 8380 and 8381 of the Public Utilities Code and updates Section 1798.98 of the Civil Code, reinforcing the restrictions on how customer consumption data can be handled. By emphasizing that utilities cannot disclose data without explicit consent, the potential for unauthorized sharing with immigration authorities is significantly curtailed. This change reflects a broader movement towards protecting consumer privacy in response to growing concerns about data security.
Assembly Bill No. 2788, introduced by Assemblymember Gloria, aims to amend existing regulations concerning the sharing of electrical and gas consumption data by public utilities in California. The key provision prohibits electrical corporations, gas corporations, and local publicly owned electric utilities from sharing a customer's consumption data with immigration authorities unless a court-ordered subpoena or judicial warrant is obtained. This legislation seeks to enhance customer privacy and protect sensitive data from unauthorized access by state or federal immigration entities.
The legislative discourse surrounding AB 2788 appears to be supportive, highlighting the importance of data privacy amid changing social attitudes towards immigration and data security. Proponents argue that such protections are essential to ensure that individuals can access utility services without the fear that their information will be misused against them. There is a clear sentiment that safeguarding personal data is critical, especially in a climate where individuals fear deportation or scrutiny based on their data being shared unlawfully.
While the bill was passed with strong support, there may still be contention surrounding its enforcement and the definition of what constitutes 'customer consent'. Some critics may argue that this could lead to challenges in data management for utilities, complicating their operations. Furthermore, there can be debates regarding whether these protections might hinder law enforcement from accessing crucial information in specific situations, balancing the need for public safety with individual privacy rights.