California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB2847

Introduced
2/20/20  
Introduced
2/20/20  
Refer
4/24/20  
Refer
4/24/20  
Report Pass
5/4/20  
Report Pass
5/4/20  
Refer
5/5/20  
Report Pass
5/7/20  
Report Pass
5/7/20  
Refer
5/11/20  
Refer
5/11/20  
Report Pass
5/20/20  
Report Pass
5/20/20  
Refer
5/20/20  
Refer
5/20/20  
Refer
6/2/20  
Report Pass
6/3/20  
Report Pass
6/3/20  
Engrossed
6/11/20  
Engrossed
6/11/20  
Refer
6/11/20  
Refer
6/11/20  
Refer
7/1/20  
Refer
7/1/20  
Report Pass
7/2/20  
Report Pass
7/2/20  
Refer
7/2/20  
Refer
7/2/20  
Report Pass
8/1/20  
Report Pass
8/1/20  
Refer
8/1/20  
Refer
8/1/20  
Refer
8/13/20  
Refer
8/13/20  
Report Pass
8/20/20  
Enrolled
8/30/20  
Enrolled
8/30/20  
Chaptered
9/29/20  
Chaptered
9/29/20  
Passed
9/29/20  

Caption

Firearms: unsafe handguns.

Impact

The implementation of AB 2847 strengthens existing standards for firearm safety by expanding the criteria defining what constitutes an unsafe handgun. The revised law mandates that semiautomatic pistols must now not only include essential safety features such as chamber load indicators and magazine disconnect mechanisms but also provide a reliable means for law enforcement to trace firearm use through microstamped bullet casings. By removing non-compliant firearms from the market, the bill aims to reduce the incidence of unintentional gun injuries and deaths, ultimately promoting safer communities.

Summary

Assembly Bill 2847, introduced by Assemblymember Chiu, amends Section 31910 of the Penal Code concerning unsafe handguns in California. The bill aims to ensure that only handguns which meet specific safety criteria can be manufactured or sold in the state. One of the key changes includes a revision in the microstamping requirements from needing to imprint in two places to just one, streamlining the process of firearm manufacturing and enhancing safety features. This legislation reflects the ongoing efforts to address gun violence and improve public safety through stringent firearm regulations.

Sentiment

The sentiment surrounding AB 2847 has been largely supportive among public safety advocates and lawmakers who view the amendments as necessary for protecting citizens. However, it has also faced opposition from gun rights groups and some firearm manufacturers who argue that the microstamping requirement is impractical and that the changes may lead to a restriction on access to firearms. This ongoing debate highlights a significant divide in perspectives on gun control and personal freedom in California.

Contention

Notable points of contention include concerns raised by firearm manufacturers about the feasibility of microstamping technology and the potential costs associated with compliance. Critics have argued that these requirements may hinder innovation and restrict consumer choice in the handgun market. Despite these concerns, proponents of the bill firmly believe that enhancing handgun safety and improving crime-solving capabilities through advanced identification measures will ultimately lead to a decrease in gun-related violence and greater accountability.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA SB452

Firearms.

CA AB1688

Firearms.

CA AB876

Firearms.

CA AB1478

Firearms: unsafe handguns.

CA AB2733

Firearms: unsafe handguns: imprinting.

CA AB857

Public banks.

IL HB5319

MICROSTAMPING-ENABLED PISTOL

CT HB06816

An Act Concerning A Study Of The Merits And Feasibility Of Requiring Microstamping-enabled Semi-automatic Pistols.