California 2023-2024 Regular Session

California Senate Bill SB452

Introduced
2/13/23  
Introduced
2/13/23  
Refer
2/22/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Refer
3/20/23  
Refer
3/29/23  
Report Pass
4/19/23  
Refer
4/20/23  
Report Pass
5/18/23  
Engrossed
5/24/23  
Engrossed
5/24/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Refer
6/1/23  
Report Pass
6/28/23  
Report Pass
6/28/23  
Refer
6/28/23  
Refer
6/28/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Report Pass
9/1/23  
Enrolled
9/14/23  
Chaptered
9/26/23  
Chaptered
9/26/23  
Passed
9/26/23  

Caption

Firearms.

Impact

The implementation of SB 452 will markedly shift the legal landscape for firearms in California. By mandating that all semiautomatic pistols include these microstamping features, the bill not only modifies existing definitions of unsafe handguns but also imposes new compliance requirements on firearms manufacturers and dealers. It additionally creates new criminal offenses for those who provide false certifications regarding microstamping features, aiming to bolster accountability within the industry.

Summary

Senate Bill 452, introduced by Blakespear, aims to amend the California Penal Code regarding the definition and regulation of firearms, specifically relating to semiautomatic pistols. The bill establishes new requirements requiring all semiautomatic pistols sold after January 1, 2028, to be equipped with a verified microstamping component—technology allowing identification of the weapon through markings on fired cartridge casings. This change is expected to enhance traceability in criminal investigations and promote overall firearm safety.

Sentiment

Public sentiment surrounding SB 452 has been split, reflecting deeper societal debates on gun control and public safety. Supporters argue that the bill provides necessary tools to assist law enforcement in tracking firearms used in crimes and could potentially reduce gun violence. Conversely, critics, particularly from factions opposing strict gun regulations, view the legislation as an infringement on Second Amendment rights and an unnecessary burden on law-abiding gun owners and dealers.

Contention

One of the notable points of contention lies in the bill's requirement that the Department of Justice assess the technological viability of microstamping components by March 1, 2025, potentially delaying enforcement until those components are available. This stipulation raises questions about the availability of the technology and the practicality of its implementation. Additionally, the bill stipulates significant penalties for non-compliance, including fines which could escalate upon repeated offenses, further complicating the operational landscape for firearms dealers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2847

Firearms: unsafe handguns.

CT HB06816

An Act Concerning A Study Of The Merits And Feasibility Of Requiring Microstamping-enabled Semi-automatic Pistols.

CA AB1688

Firearms.

IL HB5319

MICROSTAMPING-ENABLED PISTOL

US HR244

Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that mandates imposed on manufacturers requiring inclusion of unproven and unreliable technology in firearms is costly and punitive, and the prohibition of firearms without such features is an infringement on the rights of citizens under the Second Amendment.

CA AB876

Firearms.

NJ A4368

Requires firearm retailers to sell microstamping-enabled firearms upon determination of availability by AG.

NJ S2907

Requires firearm retailers to sell microstamping-enabled firearms upon determination of availability by AG.