Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that mandates imposed on manufacturers requiring inclusion of unproven and unreliable technology in firearms is costly and punitive, and the prohibition of firearms without such features is an infringement on the rights of citizens under the Second Amendment.
Impact
The bill critiques existing and proposed mandates across several states and the District of Columbia. It highlights concerns surrounding the practical implications of microstamping technology, asserting that these requirements could significantly raise the costs of firearms, affecting both law-abiding citizens and law enforcement personnel. The resolution emphasizes the claim that compliance with such mandates is not feasible and could have negative ramifications for the firearms industry, threatening jobs and financial stability.
Summary
House Resolution 244 expresses the sense of the House of Representatives regarding mandates imposed on firearms manufacturers to include microstamping technology. The bill argues that such requirements are costly, punitive, and infringe upon citizens' rights under the Second Amendment. Specifically, it cites California’s law mandating micro laser engraving on semiautomatic pistols, which is presented as an unproven approach, lacking scientific backing for its effectiveness and reliability.
Contention
Central to the discussion surrounding HR244 is the contention about the efficacy and reliability of microstamping technology. Proponents of the resolution argue that the technology is not established enough to warrant legal mandates, citing studies revealing high failure rates in legibility and consistency. The contrasting perspectives indicate a significant divide in opinion, where advocates for Second Amendment rights see this legislation as necessary to protect individual freedoms, while many lawmakers and stakeholders view it as an essential public safety measure that should not be dismissed.
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the United States should negotiate strong, inclusive, and forward-looking rules on digital trade and the digital economy with like-minded countries as part of its broader trade and economic strategy in order to ensure American values of democracy, rule of law, freedom of speech, human and worker rights, privacy, and a free and open internet are at the very core of digital governance.
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the President and the Secretary of State should ensure that the Government of Canada does not permanently store nuclear waste in the Great Lakes Basin.
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives relating to the commemoration of the 190th anniversary of diplomatic relations between the United States and the Kingdom of Thailand.
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives regarding the relationship between firearm violence and intimate partner violence and to honor the memory of Gladys Ricart and other victims of intimate partner homicide killed by firearms, and for other purposes.
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that Thomas Garrett was and should be recognized as a national abolitionist leader and activist in the struggle against slavery in the United States.
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that the Ukrainian famine of 1932-1933, known as the Holodomor, is recognized as a genocide and should serve as a reminder of repressive Soviet policies against the people of Ukraine.
Expressing the sense of the House of Representatives that it is the duty of the Federal Government to dramatically expand and strengthen the care economy.