California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB3271

Introduced
2/21/20  
Refer
4/24/20  
Report Pass
5/4/20  
Refer
5/5/20  
Report Pass
5/18/20  
Report Pass
5/18/20  
Refer
5/19/20  
Refer
5/19/20  
Report Pass
5/27/20  
Engrossed
6/15/20  
Engrossed
6/15/20  
Refer
6/16/20  
Refer
6/16/20  
Refer
7/1/20  

Caption

Enrollment agreements.

Impact

The introduction of AB 3271 would signify a significant shift in how enrollment agreements are viewed under California law, particularly regarding the rights of minors. If passed, minors would gain explicit power to reject clauses in enrollment contracts that relinquish their ability to claim damages or pursue legal actions stemming from criminal acts committed against them. This ensures that their legal rights remain intact, preserving their ability to seek justice against such heinous acts, regardless of their guardians' decisions.

Summary

Assembly Bill 3271, introduced by Assembly Member Kiley, seeks to amend existing law regarding enrollment agreements in educational institutions by empowering minors with the ability to disaffirm provisions that require them to waive their legal rights concerning criminal sexual assault and criminal sexual battery claims. The bill aims to establish that it is unreasonable for parents to bind their children to such waivers, especially concerning such serious and sensitive issues. AB 3271 specifically targets agreements related to public and private schools serving students from kindergarten through 12th grade.

Sentiment

Overall, the sentiment surrounding AB 3271 appears to be favorable, particularly among advocates for children's rights and education reform who emphasize the importance of protecting minors. The discussion reflects a growing awareness and sensitivity to issues of abuse and the trauma resulting from such experiences. However, there may be concerns from educational institutions regarding liability and administrative burdens, which could provoke debate on balancing children's rights with institutional responsibilities.

Contention

Notable points of contention may arise around the implications of enforcing this bill among educational institutions. Some might argue that disallowing waivers could lead to an influx of claims against schools and potentially discourage educational organizations from adopting contractual agreements altogether. On the other hand, proponents highlight the necessity of ensuring that vulnerable populations are protected from compromising their legal rights in exchange for educational opportunities.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB272

Enrollment agreements.

AZ HB2212

Minors; artistic performers; contracts; trust

AZ HB2564

Minors; artistic performers; contracts; trust

CO HB1251

Parental Consent to Treatment of a Minor

MT SB52

Create Montana Court of Chancery

LA HB400

Provides relative to a minor's consent for medical procedures and treatments

TX HB2759

Relating to the nonsubstantive revision of provisions of the Texas Probate Code relating to durable powers of attorney, guardianships, and other related proceedings and alternatives, and the redesignation of certain other provisions of the Texas Probate Code, including conforming amendments and repeals.

TX SB1299

Relating to the nonsubstantive revision of provisions of the Texas Probate Code relating to durable powers of attorney, guardianships, and other related proceedings and alternatives, and the redesignation of certain other provisions of the Texas Probate Code, including conforming amendments and repeals.