California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB328 Compare Versions

OldNewDifferences
1-Assembly Bill No. 328 CHAPTER 10 An act to amend Sections 21380, 21382, and 21611 of the Probate Code, relating to estates and trusts. [ Approved by Governor June 26, 2019. Filed with Secretary of State June 26, 2019. ] LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 328, Maienschein. Estates and trusts: undue influence.Existing law establishes an express presumption of fraud or undue influence when a donative instrument makes a gift to the person who drafted or transcribed the instrument or to the care custodian of a transferor who is a dependent adult, as specified. Existing law exempts, among others, spouses and cohabitants of the transferor, from the presumption of fraud or undue influence.This bill would additionally subject to the above-described presumption a gift made to a care custodian who commenced a marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership with a transferor who is a dependent adult while providing services to that dependent adult, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the dependent adult, if the donative transfer occurred, or the instrument was executed, less than 6 months after the marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership commenced.Existing law provides that if a decedent fails to provide by testamentary instrument for the decedents surviving spouse who married the decedent after the execution of all the decedents testamentary instruments, the omitted spouse is required to receive 1/2 of the decedents community and quasi-community property and a share of the separate property, as specified. However, existing law prohibits a surviving spouse from receiving a share of the decedents estate consistent with these provisions in certain circumstances, including, among others, when the spouse made a valid agreement waiving the right to share in the decedents estate.This bill would further prohibit a surviving spouse from receiving a share of the decedents estate as described above if the spouse was a care custodian of the decedent who was a dependent adult and the marriage commenced while the care custodian provided services to the decedent, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the decedent, and the decedent died less than 6 months after the marriage commenced, unless the spouse can prove by clear and convincing evidence that the marriage was not the product of fraud or undue influence.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 21380 of the Probate Code is amended to read:21380. (a) A provision of an instrument making a donative transfer to any of the following persons is presumed to be the product of fraud or undue influence:(1) The person who drafted the instrument.(2) A person who transcribed the instrument or caused it to be transcribed and who was in a fiduciary relationship with the transferor when the instrument was transcribed.(3) A care custodian of a transferor who is a dependent adult, but only if the instrument was executed during the period in which the care custodian provided services to the transferor, or within 90 days before or after that period.(4) A care custodian who commenced a marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership with a transferor who is a dependent adult while providing services to that dependent adult, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the dependent adult, if the donative transfer occurred, or the instrument was executed, less than six months after the marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership commenced.(5) A person who is related by blood or affinity, within the third degree, to any person described in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive.(6) A cohabitant or employee of any person described in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive.(7) A partner, shareholder, or employee of a law firm in which a person described in paragraph (1) or (2) has an ownership interest.(b) The presumption created by this section is a presumption affecting the burden of proof. The presumption may be rebutted by proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that the donative transfer was not the product of fraud or undue influence.(c) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), with respect to a donative transfer to the person who drafted the donative instrument, or to a person who is related to, or associated with, the drafter as described in paragraph (5), (6), or (7) of subdivision (a), the presumption created by this section is conclusive.(d) If a beneficiary is unsuccessful in rebutting the presumption, the beneficiary shall bear all costs of the proceeding, including reasonable attorneys fees.SEC. 2. Section 21382 of the Probate Code is amended to read:21382. Section 21380 does not apply to any of the following instruments or transfers:(a) Except as provided in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 21380, a donative transfer to a person who is related by blood or affinity, within the fourth degree, to the transferor or is the cohabitant of the transferor.(b) An instrument that is drafted or transcribed by a person who is related by blood or affinity, within the fourth degree, to the transferor or is the cohabitant of the transferor.(c) An instrument that is approved pursuant to an order under Article 10 (commencing with Section 2580) of Chapter 6 of Part 4 of Division 4, after full disclosure of the relationships of the persons involved.(d) A donative transfer to a federal, state, or local public entity, an entity that qualifies for an exemption from taxation under Section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code, or a trust holding the transferred property for the entity.(e) A donative transfer of property valued at five thousand dollars ($5,000) or less, if the total value of the transferors estate equals or exceeds the amount stated in Section 13100.(f) An instrument executed outside of California by a transferor who was not a resident of California when the instrument was executed.SEC. 3. Section 21611 of the Probate Code is amended to read:21611. The spouse shall not receive a share of the estate under Section 21610 if any of the following is established:(a) The decedents failure to provide for the spouse in the decedents testamentary instruments was intentional and that intention appears from the testamentary instruments.(b) The decedent provided for the spouse by transfer outside of the estate passing by the decedents testamentary instruments and the intention that the transfer be in lieu of a provision in said instruments is shown by statements of the decedent or from the amount of the transfer or by other evidence.(c) The spouse made a valid agreement waiving the right to share in the decedents estate.(d) (1) If both of the following apply:(A) The spouse was a care custodian, as that term is defined in Section 21362, of the decedent who was a dependent adult, as that term is defined in Section 21366, and the marriage commenced while the care custodian provided services to the decedent, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the decedent.(B) The decedent died less than six months after the marriage commenced.(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a spouse described by this subdivision shall be entitled to receive a share of the estate pursuant to Section 21610 if the spouse proves by clear and convincing evidence that the marriage between the spouse and the decedent was not the product of fraud or undue influence.
1+Enrolled June 18, 2019 Passed IN Senate June 17, 2019 Passed IN Assembly March 18, 2019 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 328Introduced by Assembly Member MaienscheinJanuary 31, 2019 An act to amend Sections 21380, 21382, and 21611 of the Probate Code, relating to estates and trusts. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 328, Maienschein. Estates and trusts: undue influence.Existing law establishes an express presumption of fraud or undue influence when a donative instrument makes a gift to the person who drafted or transcribed the instrument or to the care custodian of a transferor who is a dependent adult, as specified. Existing law exempts, among others, spouses and cohabitants of the transferor, from the presumption of fraud or undue influence.This bill would additionally subject to the above-described presumption a gift made to a care custodian who commenced a marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership with a transferor who is a dependent adult while providing services to that dependent adult, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the dependent adult, if the donative transfer occurred, or the instrument was executed, less than 6 months after the marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership commenced.Existing law provides that if a decedent fails to provide by testamentary instrument for the decedents surviving spouse who married the decedent after the execution of all the decedents testamentary instruments, the omitted spouse is required to receive 1/2 of the decedents community and quasi-community property and a share of the separate property, as specified. However, existing law prohibits a surviving spouse from receiving a share of the decedents estate consistent with these provisions in certain circumstances, including, among others, when the spouse made a valid agreement waiving the right to share in the decedents estate.This bill would further prohibit a surviving spouse from receiving a share of the decedents estate as described above if the spouse was a care custodian of the decedent who was a dependent adult and the marriage commenced while the care custodian provided services to the decedent, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the decedent, and the decedent died less than 6 months after the marriage commenced, unless the spouse can prove by clear and convincing evidence that the marriage was not the product of fraud or undue influence.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO Bill TextThe people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 21380 of the Probate Code is amended to read:21380. (a) A provision of an instrument making a donative transfer to any of the following persons is presumed to be the product of fraud or undue influence:(1) The person who drafted the instrument.(2) A person who transcribed the instrument or caused it to be transcribed and who was in a fiduciary relationship with the transferor when the instrument was transcribed.(3) A care custodian of a transferor who is a dependent adult, but only if the instrument was executed during the period in which the care custodian provided services to the transferor, or within 90 days before or after that period.(4) A care custodian who commenced a marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership with a transferor who is a dependent adult while providing services to that dependent adult, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the dependent adult, if the donative transfer occurred, or the instrument was executed, less than six months after the marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership commenced.(5) A person who is related by blood or affinity, within the third degree, to any person described in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive.(6) A cohabitant or employee of any person described in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive.(7) A partner, shareholder, or employee of a law firm in which a person described in paragraph (1) or (2) has an ownership interest.(b) The presumption created by this section is a presumption affecting the burden of proof. The presumption may be rebutted by proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that the donative transfer was not the product of fraud or undue influence.(c) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), with respect to a donative transfer to the person who drafted the donative instrument, or to a person who is related to, or associated with, the drafter as described in paragraph (5), (6), or (7) of subdivision (a), the presumption created by this section is conclusive.(d) If a beneficiary is unsuccessful in rebutting the presumption, the beneficiary shall bear all costs of the proceeding, including reasonable attorneys fees.SEC. 2. Section 21382 of the Probate Code is amended to read:21382. Section 21380 does not apply to any of the following instruments or transfers:(a) Except as provided in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 21380, a donative transfer to a person who is related by blood or affinity, within the fourth degree, to the transferor or is the cohabitant of the transferor.(b) An instrument that is drafted or transcribed by a person who is related by blood or affinity, within the fourth degree, to the transferor or is the cohabitant of the transferor.(c) An instrument that is approved pursuant to an order under Article 10 (commencing with Section 2580) of Chapter 6 of Part 4 of Division 4, after full disclosure of the relationships of the persons involved.(d) A donative transfer to a federal, state, or local public entity, an entity that qualifies for an exemption from taxation under Section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code, or a trust holding the transferred property for the entity.(e) A donative transfer of property valued at five thousand dollars ($5,000) or less, if the total value of the transferors estate equals or exceeds the amount stated in Section 13100.(f) An instrument executed outside of California by a transferor who was not a resident of California when the instrument was executed.SEC. 3. Section 21611 of the Probate Code is amended to read:21611. The spouse shall not receive a share of the estate under Section 21610 if any of the following is established:(a) The decedents failure to provide for the spouse in the decedents testamentary instruments was intentional and that intention appears from the testamentary instruments.(b) The decedent provided for the spouse by transfer outside of the estate passing by the decedents testamentary instruments and the intention that the transfer be in lieu of a provision in said instruments is shown by statements of the decedent or from the amount of the transfer or by other evidence.(c) The spouse made a valid agreement waiving the right to share in the decedents estate.(d) (1) If both of the following apply:(A) The spouse was a care custodian, as that term is defined in Section 21362, of the decedent who was a dependent adult, as that term is defined in Section 21366, and the marriage commenced while the care custodian provided services to the decedent, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the decedent.(B) The decedent died less than six months after the marriage commenced.(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a spouse described by this subdivision shall be entitled to receive a share of the estate pursuant to Section 21610 if the spouse proves by clear and convincing evidence that the marriage between the spouse and the decedent was not the product of fraud or undue influence.
22
3- Assembly Bill No. 328 CHAPTER 10 An act to amend Sections 21380, 21382, and 21611 of the Probate Code, relating to estates and trusts. [ Approved by Governor June 26, 2019. Filed with Secretary of State June 26, 2019. ] LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 328, Maienschein. Estates and trusts: undue influence.Existing law establishes an express presumption of fraud or undue influence when a donative instrument makes a gift to the person who drafted or transcribed the instrument or to the care custodian of a transferor who is a dependent adult, as specified. Existing law exempts, among others, spouses and cohabitants of the transferor, from the presumption of fraud or undue influence.This bill would additionally subject to the above-described presumption a gift made to a care custodian who commenced a marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership with a transferor who is a dependent adult while providing services to that dependent adult, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the dependent adult, if the donative transfer occurred, or the instrument was executed, less than 6 months after the marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership commenced.Existing law provides that if a decedent fails to provide by testamentary instrument for the decedents surviving spouse who married the decedent after the execution of all the decedents testamentary instruments, the omitted spouse is required to receive 1/2 of the decedents community and quasi-community property and a share of the separate property, as specified. However, existing law prohibits a surviving spouse from receiving a share of the decedents estate consistent with these provisions in certain circumstances, including, among others, when the spouse made a valid agreement waiving the right to share in the decedents estate.This bill would further prohibit a surviving spouse from receiving a share of the decedents estate as described above if the spouse was a care custodian of the decedent who was a dependent adult and the marriage commenced while the care custodian provided services to the decedent, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the decedent, and the decedent died less than 6 months after the marriage commenced, unless the spouse can prove by clear and convincing evidence that the marriage was not the product of fraud or undue influence.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO
3+ Enrolled June 18, 2019 Passed IN Senate June 17, 2019 Passed IN Assembly March 18, 2019 CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION Assembly Bill No. 328Introduced by Assembly Member MaienscheinJanuary 31, 2019 An act to amend Sections 21380, 21382, and 21611 of the Probate Code, relating to estates and trusts. LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGESTAB 328, Maienschein. Estates and trusts: undue influence.Existing law establishes an express presumption of fraud or undue influence when a donative instrument makes a gift to the person who drafted or transcribed the instrument or to the care custodian of a transferor who is a dependent adult, as specified. Existing law exempts, among others, spouses and cohabitants of the transferor, from the presumption of fraud or undue influence.This bill would additionally subject to the above-described presumption a gift made to a care custodian who commenced a marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership with a transferor who is a dependent adult while providing services to that dependent adult, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the dependent adult, if the donative transfer occurred, or the instrument was executed, less than 6 months after the marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership commenced.Existing law provides that if a decedent fails to provide by testamentary instrument for the decedents surviving spouse who married the decedent after the execution of all the decedents testamentary instruments, the omitted spouse is required to receive 1/2 of the decedents community and quasi-community property and a share of the separate property, as specified. However, existing law prohibits a surviving spouse from receiving a share of the decedents estate consistent with these provisions in certain circumstances, including, among others, when the spouse made a valid agreement waiving the right to share in the decedents estate.This bill would further prohibit a surviving spouse from receiving a share of the decedents estate as described above if the spouse was a care custodian of the decedent who was a dependent adult and the marriage commenced while the care custodian provided services to the decedent, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the decedent, and the decedent died less than 6 months after the marriage commenced, unless the spouse can prove by clear and convincing evidence that the marriage was not the product of fraud or undue influence.Digest Key Vote: MAJORITY Appropriation: NO Fiscal Committee: NO Local Program: NO
4+
5+ Enrolled June 18, 2019 Passed IN Senate June 17, 2019 Passed IN Assembly March 18, 2019
6+
7+Enrolled June 18, 2019
8+Passed IN Senate June 17, 2019
9+Passed IN Assembly March 18, 2019
10+
11+ CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE 20192020 REGULAR SESSION
412
513 Assembly Bill No. 328
6-CHAPTER 10
14+
15+Introduced by Assembly Member MaienscheinJanuary 31, 2019
16+
17+Introduced by Assembly Member Maienschein
18+January 31, 2019
719
820 An act to amend Sections 21380, 21382, and 21611 of the Probate Code, relating to estates and trusts.
9-
10- [ Approved by Governor June 26, 2019. Filed with Secretary of State June 26, 2019. ]
1121
1222 LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
1323
1424 ## LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST
1525
1626 AB 328, Maienschein. Estates and trusts: undue influence.
1727
1828 Existing law establishes an express presumption of fraud or undue influence when a donative instrument makes a gift to the person who drafted or transcribed the instrument or to the care custodian of a transferor who is a dependent adult, as specified. Existing law exempts, among others, spouses and cohabitants of the transferor, from the presumption of fraud or undue influence.This bill would additionally subject to the above-described presumption a gift made to a care custodian who commenced a marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership with a transferor who is a dependent adult while providing services to that dependent adult, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the dependent adult, if the donative transfer occurred, or the instrument was executed, less than 6 months after the marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership commenced.Existing law provides that if a decedent fails to provide by testamentary instrument for the decedents surviving spouse who married the decedent after the execution of all the decedents testamentary instruments, the omitted spouse is required to receive 1/2 of the decedents community and quasi-community property and a share of the separate property, as specified. However, existing law prohibits a surviving spouse from receiving a share of the decedents estate consistent with these provisions in certain circumstances, including, among others, when the spouse made a valid agreement waiving the right to share in the decedents estate.This bill would further prohibit a surviving spouse from receiving a share of the decedents estate as described above if the spouse was a care custodian of the decedent who was a dependent adult and the marriage commenced while the care custodian provided services to the decedent, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the decedent, and the decedent died less than 6 months after the marriage commenced, unless the spouse can prove by clear and convincing evidence that the marriage was not the product of fraud or undue influence.
1929
2030 Existing law establishes an express presumption of fraud or undue influence when a donative instrument makes a gift to the person who drafted or transcribed the instrument or to the care custodian of a transferor who is a dependent adult, as specified. Existing law exempts, among others, spouses and cohabitants of the transferor, from the presumption of fraud or undue influence.
2131
2232 This bill would additionally subject to the above-described presumption a gift made to a care custodian who commenced a marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership with a transferor who is a dependent adult while providing services to that dependent adult, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the dependent adult, if the donative transfer occurred, or the instrument was executed, less than 6 months after the marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership commenced.
2333
2434 Existing law provides that if a decedent fails to provide by testamentary instrument for the decedents surviving spouse who married the decedent after the execution of all the decedents testamentary instruments, the omitted spouse is required to receive 1/2 of the decedents community and quasi-community property and a share of the separate property, as specified. However, existing law prohibits a surviving spouse from receiving a share of the decedents estate consistent with these provisions in certain circumstances, including, among others, when the spouse made a valid agreement waiving the right to share in the decedents estate.
2535
2636 This bill would further prohibit a surviving spouse from receiving a share of the decedents estate as described above if the spouse was a care custodian of the decedent who was a dependent adult and the marriage commenced while the care custodian provided services to the decedent, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the decedent, and the decedent died less than 6 months after the marriage commenced, unless the spouse can prove by clear and convincing evidence that the marriage was not the product of fraud or undue influence.
2737
2838 ## Digest Key
2939
3040 ## Bill Text
3141
3242 The people of the State of California do enact as follows:SECTION 1. Section 21380 of the Probate Code is amended to read:21380. (a) A provision of an instrument making a donative transfer to any of the following persons is presumed to be the product of fraud or undue influence:(1) The person who drafted the instrument.(2) A person who transcribed the instrument or caused it to be transcribed and who was in a fiduciary relationship with the transferor when the instrument was transcribed.(3) A care custodian of a transferor who is a dependent adult, but only if the instrument was executed during the period in which the care custodian provided services to the transferor, or within 90 days before or after that period.(4) A care custodian who commenced a marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership with a transferor who is a dependent adult while providing services to that dependent adult, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the dependent adult, if the donative transfer occurred, or the instrument was executed, less than six months after the marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership commenced.(5) A person who is related by blood or affinity, within the third degree, to any person described in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive.(6) A cohabitant or employee of any person described in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive.(7) A partner, shareholder, or employee of a law firm in which a person described in paragraph (1) or (2) has an ownership interest.(b) The presumption created by this section is a presumption affecting the burden of proof. The presumption may be rebutted by proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that the donative transfer was not the product of fraud or undue influence.(c) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), with respect to a donative transfer to the person who drafted the donative instrument, or to a person who is related to, or associated with, the drafter as described in paragraph (5), (6), or (7) of subdivision (a), the presumption created by this section is conclusive.(d) If a beneficiary is unsuccessful in rebutting the presumption, the beneficiary shall bear all costs of the proceeding, including reasonable attorneys fees.SEC. 2. Section 21382 of the Probate Code is amended to read:21382. Section 21380 does not apply to any of the following instruments or transfers:(a) Except as provided in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 21380, a donative transfer to a person who is related by blood or affinity, within the fourth degree, to the transferor or is the cohabitant of the transferor.(b) An instrument that is drafted or transcribed by a person who is related by blood or affinity, within the fourth degree, to the transferor or is the cohabitant of the transferor.(c) An instrument that is approved pursuant to an order under Article 10 (commencing with Section 2580) of Chapter 6 of Part 4 of Division 4, after full disclosure of the relationships of the persons involved.(d) A donative transfer to a federal, state, or local public entity, an entity that qualifies for an exemption from taxation under Section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code, or a trust holding the transferred property for the entity.(e) A donative transfer of property valued at five thousand dollars ($5,000) or less, if the total value of the transferors estate equals or exceeds the amount stated in Section 13100.(f) An instrument executed outside of California by a transferor who was not a resident of California when the instrument was executed.SEC. 3. Section 21611 of the Probate Code is amended to read:21611. The spouse shall not receive a share of the estate under Section 21610 if any of the following is established:(a) The decedents failure to provide for the spouse in the decedents testamentary instruments was intentional and that intention appears from the testamentary instruments.(b) The decedent provided for the spouse by transfer outside of the estate passing by the decedents testamentary instruments and the intention that the transfer be in lieu of a provision in said instruments is shown by statements of the decedent or from the amount of the transfer or by other evidence.(c) The spouse made a valid agreement waiving the right to share in the decedents estate.(d) (1) If both of the following apply:(A) The spouse was a care custodian, as that term is defined in Section 21362, of the decedent who was a dependent adult, as that term is defined in Section 21366, and the marriage commenced while the care custodian provided services to the decedent, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the decedent.(B) The decedent died less than six months after the marriage commenced.(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a spouse described by this subdivision shall be entitled to receive a share of the estate pursuant to Section 21610 if the spouse proves by clear and convincing evidence that the marriage between the spouse and the decedent was not the product of fraud or undue influence.
3343
3444 The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
3545
3646 ## The people of the State of California do enact as follows:
3747
3848 SECTION 1. Section 21380 of the Probate Code is amended to read:21380. (a) A provision of an instrument making a donative transfer to any of the following persons is presumed to be the product of fraud or undue influence:(1) The person who drafted the instrument.(2) A person who transcribed the instrument or caused it to be transcribed and who was in a fiduciary relationship with the transferor when the instrument was transcribed.(3) A care custodian of a transferor who is a dependent adult, but only if the instrument was executed during the period in which the care custodian provided services to the transferor, or within 90 days before or after that period.(4) A care custodian who commenced a marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership with a transferor who is a dependent adult while providing services to that dependent adult, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the dependent adult, if the donative transfer occurred, or the instrument was executed, less than six months after the marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership commenced.(5) A person who is related by blood or affinity, within the third degree, to any person described in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive.(6) A cohabitant or employee of any person described in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive.(7) A partner, shareholder, or employee of a law firm in which a person described in paragraph (1) or (2) has an ownership interest.(b) The presumption created by this section is a presumption affecting the burden of proof. The presumption may be rebutted by proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that the donative transfer was not the product of fraud or undue influence.(c) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), with respect to a donative transfer to the person who drafted the donative instrument, or to a person who is related to, or associated with, the drafter as described in paragraph (5), (6), or (7) of subdivision (a), the presumption created by this section is conclusive.(d) If a beneficiary is unsuccessful in rebutting the presumption, the beneficiary shall bear all costs of the proceeding, including reasonable attorneys fees.
3949
4050 SECTION 1. Section 21380 of the Probate Code is amended to read:
4151
4252 ### SECTION 1.
4353
4454 21380. (a) A provision of an instrument making a donative transfer to any of the following persons is presumed to be the product of fraud or undue influence:(1) The person who drafted the instrument.(2) A person who transcribed the instrument or caused it to be transcribed and who was in a fiduciary relationship with the transferor when the instrument was transcribed.(3) A care custodian of a transferor who is a dependent adult, but only if the instrument was executed during the period in which the care custodian provided services to the transferor, or within 90 days before or after that period.(4) A care custodian who commenced a marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership with a transferor who is a dependent adult while providing services to that dependent adult, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the dependent adult, if the donative transfer occurred, or the instrument was executed, less than six months after the marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership commenced.(5) A person who is related by blood or affinity, within the third degree, to any person described in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive.(6) A cohabitant or employee of any person described in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive.(7) A partner, shareholder, or employee of a law firm in which a person described in paragraph (1) or (2) has an ownership interest.(b) The presumption created by this section is a presumption affecting the burden of proof. The presumption may be rebutted by proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that the donative transfer was not the product of fraud or undue influence.(c) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), with respect to a donative transfer to the person who drafted the donative instrument, or to a person who is related to, or associated with, the drafter as described in paragraph (5), (6), or (7) of subdivision (a), the presumption created by this section is conclusive.(d) If a beneficiary is unsuccessful in rebutting the presumption, the beneficiary shall bear all costs of the proceeding, including reasonable attorneys fees.
4555
4656 21380. (a) A provision of an instrument making a donative transfer to any of the following persons is presumed to be the product of fraud or undue influence:(1) The person who drafted the instrument.(2) A person who transcribed the instrument or caused it to be transcribed and who was in a fiduciary relationship with the transferor when the instrument was transcribed.(3) A care custodian of a transferor who is a dependent adult, but only if the instrument was executed during the period in which the care custodian provided services to the transferor, or within 90 days before or after that period.(4) A care custodian who commenced a marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership with a transferor who is a dependent adult while providing services to that dependent adult, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the dependent adult, if the donative transfer occurred, or the instrument was executed, less than six months after the marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership commenced.(5) A person who is related by blood or affinity, within the third degree, to any person described in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive.(6) A cohabitant or employee of any person described in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive.(7) A partner, shareholder, or employee of a law firm in which a person described in paragraph (1) or (2) has an ownership interest.(b) The presumption created by this section is a presumption affecting the burden of proof. The presumption may be rebutted by proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that the donative transfer was not the product of fraud or undue influence.(c) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), with respect to a donative transfer to the person who drafted the donative instrument, or to a person who is related to, or associated with, the drafter as described in paragraph (5), (6), or (7) of subdivision (a), the presumption created by this section is conclusive.(d) If a beneficiary is unsuccessful in rebutting the presumption, the beneficiary shall bear all costs of the proceeding, including reasonable attorneys fees.
4757
4858 21380. (a) A provision of an instrument making a donative transfer to any of the following persons is presumed to be the product of fraud or undue influence:(1) The person who drafted the instrument.(2) A person who transcribed the instrument or caused it to be transcribed and who was in a fiduciary relationship with the transferor when the instrument was transcribed.(3) A care custodian of a transferor who is a dependent adult, but only if the instrument was executed during the period in which the care custodian provided services to the transferor, or within 90 days before or after that period.(4) A care custodian who commenced a marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership with a transferor who is a dependent adult while providing services to that dependent adult, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the dependent adult, if the donative transfer occurred, or the instrument was executed, less than six months after the marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership commenced.(5) A person who is related by blood or affinity, within the third degree, to any person described in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive.(6) A cohabitant or employee of any person described in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive.(7) A partner, shareholder, or employee of a law firm in which a person described in paragraph (1) or (2) has an ownership interest.(b) The presumption created by this section is a presumption affecting the burden of proof. The presumption may be rebutted by proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that the donative transfer was not the product of fraud or undue influence.(c) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), with respect to a donative transfer to the person who drafted the donative instrument, or to a person who is related to, or associated with, the drafter as described in paragraph (5), (6), or (7) of subdivision (a), the presumption created by this section is conclusive.(d) If a beneficiary is unsuccessful in rebutting the presumption, the beneficiary shall bear all costs of the proceeding, including reasonable attorneys fees.
4959
5060
5161
5262 21380. (a) A provision of an instrument making a donative transfer to any of the following persons is presumed to be the product of fraud or undue influence:
5363
5464 (1) The person who drafted the instrument.
5565
5666 (2) A person who transcribed the instrument or caused it to be transcribed and who was in a fiduciary relationship with the transferor when the instrument was transcribed.
5767
5868 (3) A care custodian of a transferor who is a dependent adult, but only if the instrument was executed during the period in which the care custodian provided services to the transferor, or within 90 days before or after that period.
5969
6070 (4) A care custodian who commenced a marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership with a transferor who is a dependent adult while providing services to that dependent adult, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the dependent adult, if the donative transfer occurred, or the instrument was executed, less than six months after the marriage, cohabitation, or domestic partnership commenced.
6171
6272 (5) A person who is related by blood or affinity, within the third degree, to any person described in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive.
6373
6474 (6) A cohabitant or employee of any person described in paragraphs (1) to (3), inclusive.
6575
6676 (7) A partner, shareholder, or employee of a law firm in which a person described in paragraph (1) or (2) has an ownership interest.
6777
6878 (b) The presumption created by this section is a presumption affecting the burden of proof. The presumption may be rebutted by proving, by clear and convincing evidence, that the donative transfer was not the product of fraud or undue influence.
6979
7080 (c) Notwithstanding subdivision (b), with respect to a donative transfer to the person who drafted the donative instrument, or to a person who is related to, or associated with, the drafter as described in paragraph (5), (6), or (7) of subdivision (a), the presumption created by this section is conclusive.
7181
7282 (d) If a beneficiary is unsuccessful in rebutting the presumption, the beneficiary shall bear all costs of the proceeding, including reasonable attorneys fees.
7383
7484 SEC. 2. Section 21382 of the Probate Code is amended to read:21382. Section 21380 does not apply to any of the following instruments or transfers:(a) Except as provided in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 21380, a donative transfer to a person who is related by blood or affinity, within the fourth degree, to the transferor or is the cohabitant of the transferor.(b) An instrument that is drafted or transcribed by a person who is related by blood or affinity, within the fourth degree, to the transferor or is the cohabitant of the transferor.(c) An instrument that is approved pursuant to an order under Article 10 (commencing with Section 2580) of Chapter 6 of Part 4 of Division 4, after full disclosure of the relationships of the persons involved.(d) A donative transfer to a federal, state, or local public entity, an entity that qualifies for an exemption from taxation under Section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code, or a trust holding the transferred property for the entity.(e) A donative transfer of property valued at five thousand dollars ($5,000) or less, if the total value of the transferors estate equals or exceeds the amount stated in Section 13100.(f) An instrument executed outside of California by a transferor who was not a resident of California when the instrument was executed.
7585
7686 SEC. 2. Section 21382 of the Probate Code is amended to read:
7787
7888 ### SEC. 2.
7989
8090 21382. Section 21380 does not apply to any of the following instruments or transfers:(a) Except as provided in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 21380, a donative transfer to a person who is related by blood or affinity, within the fourth degree, to the transferor or is the cohabitant of the transferor.(b) An instrument that is drafted or transcribed by a person who is related by blood or affinity, within the fourth degree, to the transferor or is the cohabitant of the transferor.(c) An instrument that is approved pursuant to an order under Article 10 (commencing with Section 2580) of Chapter 6 of Part 4 of Division 4, after full disclosure of the relationships of the persons involved.(d) A donative transfer to a federal, state, or local public entity, an entity that qualifies for an exemption from taxation under Section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code, or a trust holding the transferred property for the entity.(e) A donative transfer of property valued at five thousand dollars ($5,000) or less, if the total value of the transferors estate equals or exceeds the amount stated in Section 13100.(f) An instrument executed outside of California by a transferor who was not a resident of California when the instrument was executed.
8191
8292 21382. Section 21380 does not apply to any of the following instruments or transfers:(a) Except as provided in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 21380, a donative transfer to a person who is related by blood or affinity, within the fourth degree, to the transferor or is the cohabitant of the transferor.(b) An instrument that is drafted or transcribed by a person who is related by blood or affinity, within the fourth degree, to the transferor or is the cohabitant of the transferor.(c) An instrument that is approved pursuant to an order under Article 10 (commencing with Section 2580) of Chapter 6 of Part 4 of Division 4, after full disclosure of the relationships of the persons involved.(d) A donative transfer to a federal, state, or local public entity, an entity that qualifies for an exemption from taxation under Section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code, or a trust holding the transferred property for the entity.(e) A donative transfer of property valued at five thousand dollars ($5,000) or less, if the total value of the transferors estate equals or exceeds the amount stated in Section 13100.(f) An instrument executed outside of California by a transferor who was not a resident of California when the instrument was executed.
8393
8494 21382. Section 21380 does not apply to any of the following instruments or transfers:(a) Except as provided in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 21380, a donative transfer to a person who is related by blood or affinity, within the fourth degree, to the transferor or is the cohabitant of the transferor.(b) An instrument that is drafted or transcribed by a person who is related by blood or affinity, within the fourth degree, to the transferor or is the cohabitant of the transferor.(c) An instrument that is approved pursuant to an order under Article 10 (commencing with Section 2580) of Chapter 6 of Part 4 of Division 4, after full disclosure of the relationships of the persons involved.(d) A donative transfer to a federal, state, or local public entity, an entity that qualifies for an exemption from taxation under Section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code, or a trust holding the transferred property for the entity.(e) A donative transfer of property valued at five thousand dollars ($5,000) or less, if the total value of the transferors estate equals or exceeds the amount stated in Section 13100.(f) An instrument executed outside of California by a transferor who was not a resident of California when the instrument was executed.
8595
8696
8797
8898 21382. Section 21380 does not apply to any of the following instruments or transfers:
8999
90100 (a) Except as provided in paragraph (4) of subdivision (a) of Section 21380, a donative transfer to a person who is related by blood or affinity, within the fourth degree, to the transferor or is the cohabitant of the transferor.
91101
92102 (b) An instrument that is drafted or transcribed by a person who is related by blood or affinity, within the fourth degree, to the transferor or is the cohabitant of the transferor.
93103
94104 (c) An instrument that is approved pursuant to an order under Article 10 (commencing with Section 2580) of Chapter 6 of Part 4 of Division 4, after full disclosure of the relationships of the persons involved.
95105
96106 (d) A donative transfer to a federal, state, or local public entity, an entity that qualifies for an exemption from taxation under Section 501(c)(3) or 501(c)(19) of the Internal Revenue Code, or a trust holding the transferred property for the entity.
97107
98108 (e) A donative transfer of property valued at five thousand dollars ($5,000) or less, if the total value of the transferors estate equals or exceeds the amount stated in Section 13100.
99109
100110 (f) An instrument executed outside of California by a transferor who was not a resident of California when the instrument was executed.
101111
102112 SEC. 3. Section 21611 of the Probate Code is amended to read:21611. The spouse shall not receive a share of the estate under Section 21610 if any of the following is established:(a) The decedents failure to provide for the spouse in the decedents testamentary instruments was intentional and that intention appears from the testamentary instruments.(b) The decedent provided for the spouse by transfer outside of the estate passing by the decedents testamentary instruments and the intention that the transfer be in lieu of a provision in said instruments is shown by statements of the decedent or from the amount of the transfer or by other evidence.(c) The spouse made a valid agreement waiving the right to share in the decedents estate.(d) (1) If both of the following apply:(A) The spouse was a care custodian, as that term is defined in Section 21362, of the decedent who was a dependent adult, as that term is defined in Section 21366, and the marriage commenced while the care custodian provided services to the decedent, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the decedent.(B) The decedent died less than six months after the marriage commenced.(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a spouse described by this subdivision shall be entitled to receive a share of the estate pursuant to Section 21610 if the spouse proves by clear and convincing evidence that the marriage between the spouse and the decedent was not the product of fraud or undue influence.
103113
104114 SEC. 3. Section 21611 of the Probate Code is amended to read:
105115
106116 ### SEC. 3.
107117
108118 21611. The spouse shall not receive a share of the estate under Section 21610 if any of the following is established:(a) The decedents failure to provide for the spouse in the decedents testamentary instruments was intentional and that intention appears from the testamentary instruments.(b) The decedent provided for the spouse by transfer outside of the estate passing by the decedents testamentary instruments and the intention that the transfer be in lieu of a provision in said instruments is shown by statements of the decedent or from the amount of the transfer or by other evidence.(c) The spouse made a valid agreement waiving the right to share in the decedents estate.(d) (1) If both of the following apply:(A) The spouse was a care custodian, as that term is defined in Section 21362, of the decedent who was a dependent adult, as that term is defined in Section 21366, and the marriage commenced while the care custodian provided services to the decedent, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the decedent.(B) The decedent died less than six months after the marriage commenced.(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a spouse described by this subdivision shall be entitled to receive a share of the estate pursuant to Section 21610 if the spouse proves by clear and convincing evidence that the marriage between the spouse and the decedent was not the product of fraud or undue influence.
109119
110120 21611. The spouse shall not receive a share of the estate under Section 21610 if any of the following is established:(a) The decedents failure to provide for the spouse in the decedents testamentary instruments was intentional and that intention appears from the testamentary instruments.(b) The decedent provided for the spouse by transfer outside of the estate passing by the decedents testamentary instruments and the intention that the transfer be in lieu of a provision in said instruments is shown by statements of the decedent or from the amount of the transfer or by other evidence.(c) The spouse made a valid agreement waiving the right to share in the decedents estate.(d) (1) If both of the following apply:(A) The spouse was a care custodian, as that term is defined in Section 21362, of the decedent who was a dependent adult, as that term is defined in Section 21366, and the marriage commenced while the care custodian provided services to the decedent, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the decedent.(B) The decedent died less than six months after the marriage commenced.(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a spouse described by this subdivision shall be entitled to receive a share of the estate pursuant to Section 21610 if the spouse proves by clear and convincing evidence that the marriage between the spouse and the decedent was not the product of fraud or undue influence.
111121
112122 21611. The spouse shall not receive a share of the estate under Section 21610 if any of the following is established:(a) The decedents failure to provide for the spouse in the decedents testamentary instruments was intentional and that intention appears from the testamentary instruments.(b) The decedent provided for the spouse by transfer outside of the estate passing by the decedents testamentary instruments and the intention that the transfer be in lieu of a provision in said instruments is shown by statements of the decedent or from the amount of the transfer or by other evidence.(c) The spouse made a valid agreement waiving the right to share in the decedents estate.(d) (1) If both of the following apply:(A) The spouse was a care custodian, as that term is defined in Section 21362, of the decedent who was a dependent adult, as that term is defined in Section 21366, and the marriage commenced while the care custodian provided services to the decedent, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the decedent.(B) The decedent died less than six months after the marriage commenced.(2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a spouse described by this subdivision shall be entitled to receive a share of the estate pursuant to Section 21610 if the spouse proves by clear and convincing evidence that the marriage between the spouse and the decedent was not the product of fraud or undue influence.
113123
114124
115125
116126 21611. The spouse shall not receive a share of the estate under Section 21610 if any of the following is established:
117127
118128 (a) The decedents failure to provide for the spouse in the decedents testamentary instruments was intentional and that intention appears from the testamentary instruments.
119129
120130 (b) The decedent provided for the spouse by transfer outside of the estate passing by the decedents testamentary instruments and the intention that the transfer be in lieu of a provision in said instruments is shown by statements of the decedent or from the amount of the transfer or by other evidence.
121131
122132 (c) The spouse made a valid agreement waiving the right to share in the decedents estate.
123133
124134 (d) (1) If both of the following apply:
125135
126136 (A) The spouse was a care custodian, as that term is defined in Section 21362, of the decedent who was a dependent adult, as that term is defined in Section 21366, and the marriage commenced while the care custodian provided services to the decedent, or within 90 days after those services were last provided to the decedent.
127137
128138 (B) The decedent died less than six months after the marriage commenced.
129139
130140 (2) Notwithstanding paragraph (1), a spouse described by this subdivision shall be entitled to receive a share of the estate pursuant to Section 21610 if the spouse proves by clear and convincing evidence that the marriage between the spouse and the decedent was not the product of fraud or undue influence.