California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB357

Introduced
2/4/19  
Refer
2/11/19  
Refer
2/11/19  
Report Pass
3/7/19  
Report Pass
3/7/19  
Refer
3/11/19  
Refer
3/11/19  
Report Pass
4/11/19  
Report Pass
4/11/19  
Refer
4/22/19  
Report Pass
4/23/19  
Report Pass
4/23/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Report Pass
5/16/19  
Engrossed
5/23/19  
Refer
5/24/19  
Refer
5/24/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Refer
6/6/19  
Report Pass
6/19/19  
Report Pass
6/19/19  
Refer
6/19/19  
Refer
6/19/19  
Report Pass
6/26/19  
Report Pass
6/26/19  
Refer
6/26/19  
Refer
6/26/19  
Refer
7/8/19  
Refer
7/8/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Report Pass
8/30/19  
Enrolled
9/10/19  
Enrolled
9/10/19  
Vetoed
10/13/19  

Caption

Taxation: tax liability: collections.

Impact

The proposed changes under AB 357 would revise the current practices of the Franchise Tax Board (FTB) when collecting taxes. By redefining tax liabilities, the FTB would no longer be able to extend collection efforts for interest, penalties, and costs beyond the periods set for the main tax liabilities. This policy could lead to a reduction in the length of time taxpayers would be pursued for debts associated with interest and fees, giving them more leeway and potentially reducing financial burdens for individuals and businesses with outstanding tax obligations.

Summary

Assembly Bill 357, introduced by Assembly Member Nazarian, aims to amend Section 19255 of the Revenue and Taxation Code, specifically focusing on how tax liabilities are defined and collected. The bill proposes significant changes by excluding interest, penalties, costs, and certain fees from the definition of tax liability. Moreover, it establishes that the collection period for these excluded items will terminate simultaneously with the related tax liability. This is intended to clarify and streamline the tax collection process within California's taxing framework.

Sentiment

General sentiment surrounding AB 357 appears to be positive, with supporters arguing that it provides necessary consumer protection and fairness in tax collections. Advocates highlight that the current system can be overly punitive and stressful for taxpayers who already struggle to meet their obligations. However, there may also be concerns among some fiscal conservatives regarding how this could affect state revenue in the long term, particularly if it encourages delinquency among some taxpayers.

Contention

Notable points of contention revolve around the potential impacts of limiting the collection of interest and penalties. Critics may argue that such changes could create incentives for taxpayers to delay payments, undermining the integrity of the tax system. Additionally, discussions may arise about the FTB's capacity to maintain its revenue streams if limited in how long it can enforce collection for certain liabilities. The balance between taxpayer relief and ensuring state revenues remains a critical point of debate.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB2369

Taxation: tax liability: collections.

CA AB1257

Franchise Tax Board: debtor payment priorities.

MO SB1232

Modifies provisions relating to video service providers

MO SB999

Modifies provisions relating to video service providers

MO SB947

Modifies provisions relating to video services

MO SB803

Modifies provisions relating to video services

MO SB299

Modifies the definition of "video service" for provision of law relating to video service providers

MO SB1316

Modifies provisions relating to video services