California 2019-2020 Regular Session

California Assembly Bill AB387

Introduced
2/5/19  
Introduced
2/5/19  
Refer
2/15/19  
Refer
2/15/19  
Report Pass
4/11/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Refer
4/23/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Refer
5/1/19  
Report Pass
5/20/19  
Report Pass
5/20/19  
Engrossed
5/29/19  
Engrossed
5/29/19  
Refer
5/30/19  
Refer
5/30/19  
Refer
6/12/19  
Report Pass
7/2/19  
Report Pass
7/2/19  
Refer
7/2/19  
Refer
7/2/19  
Report Pass
7/8/19  
Report Pass
7/8/19  
Refer
7/8/19  
Refer
7/8/19  
Report Pass
8/12/19  
Report Pass
8/12/19  
Refer
8/12/19  
Refer
8/12/19  

Caption

Task force: adverse drug events: prescriptions.

Impact

The establishment of the advisory task force signals a proactive approach to tackling the issue of medication adherence and safety. By mandating a report on findings and recommendations to be delivered to the Medical Board of California and the California State Board of Pharmacy, the bill emphasizes a collaborative effort to improve practices within the medical and pharmacy sectors. The potential regulations proposed by the task force aim to enhance patient understanding and engagement in their own healthcare, directly addressing the persistent issue of medication mismanagement.

Summary

Assembly Bill 387 introduces a significant shift in how prescription medication labels are regulated in California, aiming to enhance the safety and adherence to prescribed medications. This bill establishes the Prescription Labeling and Adverse Drug Event Prevention Advisory Task Force, which is tasked with making recommendations that focus on including specific information about prescribed drugs on labels, such as the condition or purpose for which the drug is prescribed. This initiative is particularly important in reducing adverse drug events that can occur when patients lack clear information about their medications.

Sentiment

The sentiment regarding AB 387 appears to be largely positive among healthcare professionals and patient advocacy groups who recognize the importance of clear communication in medical treatments. Supporters argue that the proposed measures could significantly improve patient safety and adherence to prescribed therapies. However, there may be concerns regarding the practical implications of implementing mandatory changes to labeling practices, particularly among pharmacists who may face increased administrative burdens.

Contention

While the intent behind AB 387 is to enhance patient safety and adherence, some potential points of contention could arise regarding the feasibility and costs associated with implementing the task force's recommendations. Questions may emerge about how the changes will be financed and the impact on smaller pharmacies. There is also the broader discussion on how to balance regulatory measures with the operational realities of pharmacy practice, ensuring that the changes foster better health outcomes without overwhelming healthcare providers.

Companion Bills

No companion bills found.

Similar Bills

CA AB1503

Pharmacy.

CA AB2100

Medi-Cal: pharmacy benefits.

CA SB524

Pharmacists: furnishing prescription medications.

CA SB1240

Prescription drugs: CURES database.

CA SB1442

Community pharmacies: staffing.

CA SB1426

Pharmacists: authority to prescribe and dispense dangerous drugs and devices.

CA AB2055

Controlled substances: CURES database.

CA AB852

Health care practitioners: electronic prescriptions.